Ehrlich Elias, Adje George, Gaedke Ursula
Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Department of Fish Biology, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany.
Ecology. 2025 Aug;106(8):e70156. doi: 10.1002/ecy.70156.
Strong environmental changes such as climate change or overfishing threaten biodiversity and important ecosystem functions, and it is unclear whether and at what speed natural communities can adapt. The shape of interspecific trade-offs between functional traits is key to understanding community composition and response as it determines which strategies or trait combinations are feasible in a community. The trade-off shape describes the curvature of the boundary of the feasible trait space, which is determined by physiological, energetic or other constraints. Under environmental change, communities adapt toward species with strategies matching the new conditions, but we lack insights into how the trade-off shape affects the mechanism and speed of community adaptation and maintenance of ecosystem functions. We used a diamond-shaped food web model to test how a prey community adapts to altered environmental conditions (altered predation pressure) depending on the shape of an interspecific growth-defense trade-off and how this influences diversity and ecosystem functions (i.e., community-level biomasses). We considered different types (chronic and periodic) and speeds of environmental change. Our study shows that the mechanism and speed of community adaptation depend crucially on the trade-off shape. For convex trade-offs, community adaptation arose through altered frequencies of coexisting resident species with very different, extreme trait combinations. Here, adaptation proceeded relatively quickly and maintained ecosystem functions even at relatively high speeds of environmental change. This held given the existence of stabilizing mechanisms that promoted the coexistence of these extreme species. In contrast, concave trade-offs led to a different adaptation mechanism: species turnover with progressive immigration of new species (from one extreme to the other via intermediate trait combinations) which took longer. Communities facing a concave trade-off varied more in species composition over time or space, implying a higher temporal or spatial -diversity, but were more sensitive to rapid environmental changes than those facing a convex trade-off. Our results reveal that knowing the trade-off shape can be important for understanding and predicting community adaptation, functional diversity, and maintenance of ecosystem function under future environmental change.
诸如气候变化或过度捕捞等强烈的环境变化威胁着生物多样性和重要的生态系统功能,而且尚不清楚自然群落能否以及以何种速度适应。功能性状之间种间权衡的形式是理解群落组成和响应的关键,因为它决定了哪些策略或性状组合在一个群落中是可行的。权衡形式描述了可行性状空间边界的曲率,这是由生理、能量或其他限制因素决定的。在环境变化下,群落会朝着具有与新条件相匹配策略的物种方向适应,但我们缺乏对权衡形式如何影响群落适应机制和速度以及生态系统功能维持的深入了解。我们使用了一个菱形食物网模型来测试猎物群落如何根据种间生长 - 防御权衡的形式适应变化的环境条件(改变的捕食压力),以及这如何影响多样性和生态系统功能(即群落水平的生物量)。我们考虑了不同类型(长期和周期性)和速度的环境变化。我们的研究表明,群落适应的机制和速度关键取决于权衡形式。对于凸形权衡,群落适应是通过具有非常不同、极端性状组合的共存常驻物种频率的改变而产生的。在这里,适应过程相对较快,即使在相对较高的环境变化速度下也能维持生态系统功能。前提是存在促进这些极端物种共存的稳定机制,情况就是如此。相比之下,凹形权衡导致了一种不同的适应机制:随着新物种(从一个极端通过中间性状组合到另一个极端)的逐步迁入而发生物种更替,这需要更长时间。面临凹形权衡的群落在物种组成上随时间或空间变化更大,这意味着更高的时间或空间多样性,但比面临凸形权衡的群落对快速环境变化更敏感。我们的结果表明,了解权衡形式对于理解和预测未来环境变化下的群落适应、功能多样性以及生态系统功能的维持可能很重要。