Görres Charlyn, Pabst Alexander, Zülke Andrea E, Glaesmer Heide, Hinz Andreas, Engel Christoph, Kirsten Toralf, Reyes Nigar, Loeffler Markus, Riedel-Heller Steffi G, Löbner Margrit
Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Depress Anxiety. 2025 Jul 30;2025:1883623. doi: 10.1155/da/1883623. eCollection 2025.
Anxiety disorders are among the most prevalent mental illnesses worldwide, with a 12-month prevalence rate of 14%-15.3%. Prior research has demonstrated a correlation between unemployment and impaired mental health. The primary objective of this study is to examine the relationship between anxiety and employment status in Germany. The sample consisted of 4885 working-age participants (18-65 years) from the baseline survey of a population-based cohort study. Anxiety was assessed using the General Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7). Employment status was divided into four groups: full-time employment (FTE group), part-time employment (PTE group), ALG I (ALG I group, being unemployed receiving entitlement-based benefits), and ALG II (ALG II group, being unemployed receiving means-tested benefits). Negative binomial regressions were conducted to examine the association between anxiety, employment status, sociodemographic variables (age, sex, marital status, and education), and social resources (Lubben Social Network Scale 6 [LSNS-6]). The prevalence of anxiety symptoms (FTE group: 5.0%, PTE group: 4.8%, ALG I group: 2.7%, and ALG II group: 17.6%) differed between employment status groups. The ALG II group exhibited a markedly elevated prevalence compared to all other groups ( < 0.001). The prevalence of anxiety symptoms was higher among females in the FTE group (7.6%) compared to males (2.9%) in the same category ( < 0.001). The initial regression model indicated a statistically significant association between anxiety symptoms and the ALG II group ( < 0.001) and the PTE group (=0.006). After including additional variables, this effect maintained its statistical significance. Factors associated with a higher risk of anxiety symptoms were female sex ( < 0.001), low educational level (=0.007), and less social resources ( < 0.001). Unemployed individuals who receive ALG II are at the highest risk of developing anxiety symptoms among those who are able to work. These findings suggest the need for targeted psychosocial and occupational support for unemployed individuals receiving ALG II.
焦虑症是全球最普遍的精神疾病之一,12个月患病率为14%-15.3%。先前的研究表明失业与心理健康受损之间存在关联。本研究的主要目的是探讨德国焦虑与就业状况之间的关系。样本包括来自一项基于人群的队列研究基线调查的4885名工作年龄参与者(18-65岁)。使用广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7(GAD-7)评估焦虑情况。就业状况分为四组:全职就业(全职就业组)、兼职就业(兼职就业组)、一类失业救济金领取者(一类失业救济金领取者组,失业并领取基于权利的福利)和二类失业救济金领取者(二类失业救济金领取者组,失业并领取经收入调查的福利)。进行负二项回归以检验焦虑、就业状况、社会人口统计学变量(年龄、性别、婚姻状况和教育程度)以及社会资源(鲁本社会网络量表6[LSNS-6])之间的关联。焦虑症状的患病率在不同就业状况组之间存在差异(全职就业组:5.0%,兼职就业组:4.8%,一类失业救济金领取者组:2.7%,二类失业救济金领取者组:17.6%)。与所有其他组相比,二类失业救济金领取者组的患病率显著升高(<0.001)。全职就业组中女性的焦虑症状患病率(7.6%)高于同组男性(2.9%)(<0.001)。初始回归模型表明焦虑症状与二类失业救济金领取者组(<0.001)和兼职就业组(=0.006)之间存在统计学显著关联。纳入其他变量后,这种效应仍保持统计学显著性。与焦虑症状风险较高相关的因素包括女性(<0.001)、低教育水平(=0.007)和较少的社会资源(<0.001)。在有工作能力的人群中,领取二类失业救济金的失业者出现焦虑症状的风险最高。这些发现表明需要为领取二类失业救济金的失业者提供有针对性的心理社会和职业支持。