Peters Hannah, Ahn Byunghoon, Gong Ruilin, Lou Nigel Mantou, Harley Jason M
Department of Surgery, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.
Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Can Med Educ J. 2025 Jul 2;16(3):56-66. doi: 10.36834/cmej.81517. eCollection 2025 Jul.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Medical trainee harassment is a global issue that has led to a multitude of detrimental effects. An important area of consideration is whether harassment policies are clear and available to all medical trainees globally. We aimed to develop a standardized rubric for evaluating anti-harassment policies and assess policies across Canadian medical schools and top international universities to identify strengths and areas for improvement.
We constructed a rubric by synthesizing criteria from established frameworks on harassment policy effectiveness, adapting key elements to assess clarity, accessibility, and comprehensiveness in medical school policies. On March 2023, we evaluated 58 harassment policies from 16 Canadian medical schools and 31 policies from eight of the top 10 Quacquarelli Symonds (QS)-ranked universities. Our rubric, developed from four key frameworks, scored policies across three themes: (1) Policy Foundation, (2) Complaint Procedures, and (3) Resolution and Implementation.
Canadian universities performed well in foundational policy areas (average score 83.00% on Theme 1) but showed meaningful gaps in Complaint Procedures (48.75%) and Resolution and Implementation (39.38%). Top international QS-ranked universities similarly scored low in these latter themes, though they performed better on formal complaint processes. Key areas needing improvement include informal complaint procedures and timelines for response in Canadian universities, and policy revision commitments in top QS-ranked universities.
This study highlights the need for enhanced anti-harassment policies, particularly in complaint and resolution procedures. Our rubric provides a structured approach for policy evaluation, enabling Canadian and potentially international institutions to improve policy clarity, accessibility, and comprehensiveness, fostering safer training environments.
背景/目的:医学生受骚扰是一个全球性问题,已导致诸多有害影响。一个重要的考量领域是骚扰政策是否清晰并可供全球所有医学生获取。我们旨在制定一个标准化的评分标准来评估反骚扰政策,并评估加拿大各医学院校以及国际顶尖大学的相关政策,以确定其优势和改进领域。
我们通过综合关于骚扰政策有效性的既定框架中的标准来构建评分标准,调整关键要素以评估医学院校政策的清晰度、可获取性和全面性。2023年3月,我们评估了来自16所加拿大医学院校的58项骚扰政策以及来自排名前十的夸夸雷利·西蒙兹(QS)世界大学中的八所大学的31项政策。我们基于四个关键框架制定的评分标准,从三个主题对政策进行评分:(1)政策基础,(2)投诉程序,以及(3)解决与实施。
加拿大大学在基础政策领域表现良好(主题1平均得分83.00%),但在投诉程序(48.75%)和解决与实施(39.38%)方面存在显著差距。国际QS排名靠前的大学在这些后期主题上的得分同样较低,不过它们在正式投诉流程方面表现较好。需要改进的关键领域包括加拿大大学的非正式投诉程序和回复时间线,以及QS排名靠前的大学的政策修订承诺。
本研究强调了加强反骚扰政策的必要性,特别是在投诉和解决程序方面。我们的评分标准为政策评估提供了一种结构化方法,使加拿大乃至潜在的国际机构能够提高政策的清晰度、可获取性和全面性,营造更安全的培训环境。