Suppr超能文献

数字连线测验在患有白质病变的老年人中的表现。

Performance of the digital trail making test in older adults with white matter lesions.

作者信息

Shan Xinjun, Tian Le, Zhao Hongyi, Zhao Xiuli, Wei Fangyuan

机构信息

Department of Emergency, Baoding No. 1 Hospital, Baoding, China.

Department of Neurology, Mental Health Institute of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, The Third Hospital of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot, China.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jul 23;19:1572971. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1572971. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have reported that digital assessment technology coupled with the traditional Trail Making Test (TMT) can capture additional information about a new cognitive domain.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of the current study is to demonstrate the performance of the digital Trail Making Test (dTMT) in older people with white matter lesions (WML).

METHODS

In this single-center, observational study, 18 elderly patients with WML admitted to our hospital from June 2021 to June 2022 served as the WML group, and 18 participants matched for age, gender, and educational level who were undergoing physical examination in our hospital during the same period served as the control group. The participants completed the dTMT Part A (dTMTA) and dTMT Part B (dTMTB) to obtain the outcomes, such as dTMT completion time, number of errors, time inside each circle, total pathway deviation of each step, and velocity of drawing of each step. The severity of WML was scored using the Fazekas scale. Multiple neuropsychological assessments were carried out to assess cognitive function. The Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) was used to display the unimanual dexterity (dominant hand task) and fine motor control (assembly task). The relationships between dTMT variables and cognition and motion in elderly patients with WML were analyzed using linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The WML group required significantly more time to complete the dTMTA (19.78 ± 1.92 s vs. 18.17 ± 1.72 s,  = 0.012) and dTMTB (38.83 ± 4.33 vs. 34.00 ± 2.99, < 0.001). For dTMTA, larger pathway deviation (43.76 ± 4.50 vs. 39.81 ± 4.66,  = 0.014) and lower velocity (17.05 ± 4.72 vs. 20.50 ± 4.00,  = 0.024) were found in the WML group. For dTMTB, longer time in the circle (30.02 ± 7.19 vs. 16.22 ± 4.70, < 0.001), larger pathway deviation (47.00 ± 4.40 vs. 41.96 ± 6.44,  = 0.010), and lower velocity (11.48 ± 2.75 vs. 14.18 ± 3.86,  = 0.021) were exhibited in aged individuals with WML. Linear regression analysis showed that the time spent inside each circle showed a positive correlation with the Mini-Mental State Evaluation (MMSE) ( = 0.015, standardized  = 0.454) and PPT unimanual task ( = 0.024, standardized  = 0.420) for dTMTA; and the total time to completion was negatively correlated with the PPT assembly task ( = 0.001, standardized  = -0.583).

CONCLUSION

Older adults with WML showed abnormalities while solving the dTMT. dTMT might be a potential indicator for cognitive and fine motor deficits in patients with WML.

摘要

背景

研究报告称,数字评估技术与传统的连线测验(TMT)相结合,可以获取有关一个新的认知领域的更多信息。

目的

本研究的目的是证明数字连线测验(dTMT)在患有白质病变(WML)的老年人中的表现。

方法

在这项单中心观察性研究中,2021年6月至2022年6月入住我院的18例患有WML的老年患者作为WML组,同期在我院接受体检的18名年龄、性别和教育水平相匹配的参与者作为对照组。参与者完成dTMT A部分(dTMTA)和dTMT B部分(dTMTB)以获得结果,如dTMT完成时间、错误数量、每个圆圈内的时间、每一步的总路径偏差以及每一步的绘图速度。使用Fazekas量表对白质病变的严重程度进行评分。进行多项神经心理学评估以评估认知功能。普渡钉板测验(PPT)用于显示单手灵活性(优势手任务)和精细运动控制(组装任务)。使用线性回归分析来分析dTMT变量与患有WML的老年患者的认知和运动之间的关系。

结果

WML组完成dTMTA(19.78±1.92秒对18.17±1.72秒,P = 0.012)和dTMTB(38.83±4.33对34.00±2.99,P < 0.001)所需的时间明显更长。对于dTMTA,WML组的路径偏差更大(43.76±4.50对39.81±4.66,P = 0.014)且速度更低(17.05±4.72对20.50±4.00,P = 0.024)。对于dTMTB,患有WML的老年人在圆圈内的时间更长(30.02±7.19对16.22±4.70,P < 0.001)、路径偏差更大(47.00±4.40对41.96±6.44,P = 0.010)且速度更低(11.48±2.75对14.18±3.86,P = 0.021)。线性回归分析表明,对于dTMTA,每个圆圈内花费的时间与简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)呈正相关(P = 0.015,标准化β = 0.454)和PPT单手任务呈正相关(P = 0.024,标准化β = 0.420);而完成的总时间与PPT组装任务呈负相关(P = 0.001,标准化β = -0.583)。

结论

患有WML的老年人在解决dTMT时表现出异常。dTMT可能是WML患者认知和精细运动缺陷的一个潜在指标。

相似文献

7
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验