Munoz-Lora Victor R M, Rogerio Victor, Thiesen Vanessa, Carnevali Ana C N, Bravo Carlos, Shridharani Sachin M, Eccleston David, Alfertshofer Michael, Germani Marcelo, Cotofana Sebastian
Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Guarulhos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Let's HOF Academy, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Aug;24(8):e70188. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70188.
While traditionally focused on treating glabellar and forehead rhytids through direct neuromodulator injections, recent findings on the biomechanics of facial muscles suggest that glabellar treatments alone may influence forehead wrinkles by altering the dynamic balance between depressor and elevator muscles.
To evaluate whether glabellar-only neuromodulator treatments can reduce forehead wrinkle severity without direct injections into the frontalis muscle.
This prospective, interventional study included 18 participants with moderate to very severe glabellar lines. Neuromodulator (AbobotulinumtoxinA; 37.5 sU (= 15 IU)) injections were administered exclusively in the glabella at three intervals over 7 months. Glabellar Severity Scale (GLSS), Forehead Wrinkle Scale (FWS), Frontal Skin Displacement (FSD), and Eyebrow Position Scoring (EPS) were assessed at baseline and 30 days after each cycle.
GLSS scores significantly improved across treatment cycles (baseline: 3.0; post-third cycle: 1.0; p < 0.001). FWS improved from 3.0 at baseline to 1.0 after the third cycle (p = 0.005), while FSD showed a significant reduction from 37.2 mm to 17.9 mm (p < 0.01). No changes in eyebrow position were detected following EPS assessment.
Glabellar-only neuromodulator treatments with 37.5 sU (= 15 IU) effectively reduced forehead rhytid severity, likely by altering the balance between depressor and elevator muscles. This approach minimizes risks associated with direct frontalis injections and offers a novel strategy for forehead rejuvenation. Moreover, the observed progressive improvement across treatment cycles suggests that this strategy may continuously enhance aesthetic outcomes over time, supporting the rationale for maintenance treatments at regular intervals.
传统上,肉毒毒素注射主要用于通过直接注射神经调节剂来治疗眉间纹和额头皱纹,但最近关于面部肌肉生物力学的研究结果表明,单独治疗眉间纹可能会通过改变降肌和升肌之间的动态平衡来影响额头皱纹。
评估仅针对眉间进行神经调节剂治疗能否在不直接注射额肌的情况下降低额头皱纹的严重程度。
这项前瞻性干预研究纳入了18名患有中度至重度眉间纹的参与者。在7个月内分三个阶段仅在眉间注射神经调节剂(阿柏西普肉毒毒素A;37.5 sU(=15 IU))。在基线时以及每个周期后的30天评估眉间严重程度量表(GLSS)、额头皱纹量表(FWS)、额部皮肤位移(FSD)和眉毛位置评分(EPS)。
在整个治疗周期中,GLSS评分显著改善(基线:3.0;第三个周期后:1.0;p<0.001)。FWS从基线时的3.0改善到第三个周期后的1.0(p=0.005),而FSD从37.2毫米显著降低至17.9毫米(p<0.01)。EPS评估后未检测到眉毛位置的变化。
仅针对眉间进行37.5 sU(=15 IU)的神经调节剂治疗可有效降低额头皱纹的严重程度,可能是通过改变降肌和升肌之间的平衡。这种方法将与直接额肌注射相关的风险降至最低,并为额头年轻化提供了一种新策略。此外,在整个治疗周期中观察到的渐进性改善表明,随着时间的推移,这种策略可能会持续改善美学效果,支持定期进行维持治疗的基本原理。