Wood Erica, Mulhern Riley E, Gibson Jacqueline MacDonald, Reich Brian J, McWilliams Andrea, Liyanapatirana Chamindu, Hoffman Kelly, Kondash Andrew J, Hoponick Redmon Jennifer
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Aug 19;59(32):16852-16863. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c02521. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
Drinking water contributes 1.2-61% of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure, but little information is available on PFAS in private wells serving 17% of the U.S. population. Well users ( = 271) from four U.S. states collected tap water samples for analysis of 25 PFAS. Participants received results report comparing their water to PFAS health guidelines and recommending water filters when guidelines were exceeded. Follow-up surveys asked respondents what actions they took in response. To identify potential PFAS sources, we computed distances from households to PFAS sources recorded in EPA's PFAS Analytic Tools and other public databases and used spatial regression models to analyze relationships between these sources and water quality. PFAS were found in 15% of wells in the area with no known sources, some above a health guideline, and 53-88% of wells at sites with known sources. Total PFAS concentrations were significantly higher in wells closer to PFAS production facilities, Superfund sites, spill sites, and federal facilities. When recommended, 49% installed filters, while none did where water met the guidelines. Our study sheds insight into geographic variation in PFAS in private wells, the influence of potential PFAS sources on well water quality, and private well user decision-making in response to PFAS water quality information.
饮用水对全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)暴露的贡献率为1.2%至61%,但关于为17%的美国人口提供服务的私人水井中的PFAS情况,我们所知甚少。来自美国四个州的水井用户(n = 271)采集了自来水样本,用于分析25种PFAS。参与者收到了结果报告,该报告将他们的水样与PFAS健康指南进行比较,并在超过指南标准时推荐使用滤水器。后续调查询问了受访者采取了什么应对行动。为了确定潜在的PFAS来源,我们计算了家庭与美国环境保护局PFAS分析工具及其他公共数据库中记录的PFAS来源之间的距离,并使用空间回归模型分析这些来源与水质之间的关系。在该地区没有已知来源的水井中,15%检测出了PFAS,其中一些超过了健康指南标准;在有已知来源的地点,53%至88%的水井检测出了PFAS。离PFAS生产设施、超级基金场地、泄漏场地和联邦设施较近的水井中,PFAS的总浓度显著更高。在收到推荐后,49%的用户安装了滤水器,而在水质符合指南标准的地方,无人安装。我们的研究揭示了私人水井中PFAS的地理差异、潜在PFAS来源对井水水质的影响,以及私人水井用户针对PFAS水质信息的决策情况。