Davoodi Pouya Koureh, Hajizadeh Farnusch, Rezaei Mohammad
Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 7;15(1):28950. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14332-1.
Accurate classification of rock masses is an essential task in earth sciences applications. Among various classification systems, the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) and Geological Strength Index (GSI) are the most frequently utilized ones. Unlike the RMR, which is a quantitative classification, GSI is a qualitative system and needs to be converted into a quantitative one as well due to its multiple applicability in both mining and civil engineering projects. With this objective, GSI quantification directly from RMR can be an attractive issue as it remains a complex task still due to the limited accuracy and generalizability of existing empirical models under varying geological conditions. This study addresses this challenge by analyzing data from fourteen different rock types and employing three metaheuristic optimization algorithms, namely Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated Annealing (SA), and Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), to develop predictive models for quantifying GSI based on the RMR. Accordingly, five mathematical GSI-RMR equations including linear, power, exponential, polynomial and logarithmic types were first developed using each algorithm. The resulting equations were assessed using six statistical indicators: R, RMSE, MAE, ASE, MAPE, and MARE. According to this evaluation, the best-performing equation from each algorithm was selected as the optimum and further evaluated using both graphical and statistical analyses, including comparisons with conventional empirical relationships. The findings revealed that the derived GSI-RMR equation from the SA algorithm achieved superior performance based on the score analysis and the REC curve. However, complementary evaluation using A20, IOA, and IOS metrics showed that the derived equation GSI-RMR equations from the GWO and PSO algorithms outperformed SA in certain aspects. These results demonstrate the unique strengths of all three proposed GSI-RMR equations and highlight the importance of multi-criteria evaluation. Overall, the proposed models provide a more accurate and generalizable framework for quantifying GSI from RMR, improving upon traditional empirical methods and enhancing the required accuracy compared to the qualitative GSI estimation. These models were further applied to estimate rock mass strength parameters and to propose suitable support systems for selected rock types, demonstrating their practical applicability in engineering design.
岩体的准确分类是地球科学应用中的一项重要任务。在各种分类系统中,岩体质量指标(RMR)和地质强度指标(GSI)是最常用的。与作为定量分类的RMR不同,GSI是一种定性系统,由于其在采矿和土木工程项目中的多种适用性,也需要转换为定量系统。出于这个目的,直接从RMR进行GSI量化可能是一个有吸引力的问题,因为由于现有经验模型在不同地质条件下的准确性和通用性有限,这仍然是一项复杂的任务。本研究通过分析来自14种不同岩石类型的数据,并采用三种元启发式优化算法,即粒子群优化(PSO)、模拟退火(SA)和灰狼优化(GWO),来开发基于RMR量化GSI的预测模型,从而应对这一挑战。因此,首先使用每种算法开发了五个数学GSI-RMR方程,包括线性、幂、指数、多项式和对数类型。使用六个统计指标对所得方程进行评估:R、RMSE、MAE、ASE、MAPE和MARE。根据该评估,选择每种算法中性能最佳的方程作为最优方程,并使用图形和统计分析进行进一步评估,包括与传统经验关系的比较。研究结果表明,基于得分分析和REC曲线,SA算法导出的GSI-RMR方程具有卓越的性能。然而,使用A20、IOA和IOS指标进行的补充评估表明,GWO和PSO算法导出的GSI-RMR方程在某些方面优于SA。这些结果证明了所有三个提出的GSI-RMR方程的独特优势,并突出了多标准评估的重要性。总体而言,所提出的模型为从RMR量化GSI提供了一个更准确和通用的框架,改进了传统经验方法,并提高了与定性GSI估计相比所需的准确性。这些模型进一步应用于估计岩体强度参数,并为选定的岩石类型提出合适的支护系统,证明了它们在工程设计中的实际适用性。