Wolf G, Koskinen-Moffett L, Kokich V
J Anat. 1985 Mar;140 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2):245-58.
The use of a carbon particle tattoo provided stable periosteal markers and a means of recording periosteal movement both anteroposteriorly and transversely during growth in guinea-pigs. In general, the periosteum migrated toward the cranial sutures. The radial pattern, demonstrated on the frontal bones and indicated on the nasal and parietal bones, showed that a periosteal envelope is identifiable with each bone. The area of origin of this centrifugal pattern of migration coincided with the ossification centre of that bone. Trabeculae and vascular canals tended to point in the direction of periosteal migration. The anteroposterior periosteal migration was proportional to but less than the anteroposterior growth of the craniofacial bones studied. The absolute medial periosteal marker migration, similar on the frontal and parietal bones, was directed in the opposite direction from the slight transverse bone growth. This may indicate a biophysical response to tension on the fibrous periosteum from the principally anteroposterior craniofacial growth. The amount of growth at the frontonasal, coronal and midline sutures diminished from anterior to posterior. The observed histological and morphological sutural characteristics concurred with these growth changes which correlate with the decreased cranial and increased facial growth during the age period studied. Although the fibrous periosteum is continuous over the separate membranous bones its behaviour appears to be intimately related to the growth of the craniofacial bones which it covers. The blending of the fibrous periosteum within the transverse sutures may prevent significant migration across craniofacial bones. It seems that the observed migratory patterns result from a close association of the fibrous periosteum with each growing craniofacial bone. The relationship of the fibrous periosteum to the growth of the craniofacial bones is a question requiring further investigation.
在豚鼠生长过程中,使用碳粒子纹身可提供稳定的骨膜标记物,并记录骨膜在前后方向和横向的移动情况。一般来说,骨膜向颅缝迁移。在额骨上显示并在鼻骨和顶骨上表明的放射状模式表明,每块骨头都有一个可识别的骨膜包膜。这种离心式迁移模式的起源区域与该骨头的骨化中心重合。小梁和血管通道倾向于指向骨膜迁移的方向。骨膜的前后迁移与所研究的颅面骨的前后生长成比例,但小于其前后生长。额骨和顶骨上相似的内侧骨膜标记物绝对迁移方向与轻微的横向骨生长方向相反。这可能表明对主要来自颅面前后生长的纤维骨膜上的张力的生物物理反应。额鼻缝、冠状缝和中线缝处的生长量从前向后逐渐减少。观察到的组织学和形态学缝特征与这些生长变化一致,这些生长变化与所研究年龄阶段颅骨生长减少和面部生长增加相关。尽管纤维骨膜在单独的膜性骨上是连续的,但其行为似乎与它所覆盖的颅面骨的生长密切相关。纤维骨膜在横向缝内的融合可能会阻止其在颅面骨之间的显著迁移。似乎观察到的迁移模式是由于纤维骨膜与每块生长的颅面骨紧密相连所致。纤维骨膜与颅面骨生长的关系是一个需要进一步研究的问题。