Suppr超能文献

急性肾损伤临床实践指南:方法学质量的系统评价

Clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury: a systematic review of the methodological quality.

作者信息

Li Ruizhe, Wu Lanxia, Wu Xinhui, Fu Qingyang, Xu Mingyu, Zhai Xu, Chen Junfei

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing University, Beijing, China.

School of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 24;12:1567359. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1567359. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hospitalized patients, particularly those in the ICU, face a significant risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that outline diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for AKI can be valuable tools for healthcare professionals, but their effectiveness hinges on their quality. The research aims to conduct a systematic review focusing on the methodological and reporting quality of CPGs addressing acute kidney injury.

DESIGN

A systematic review of CPGs for the management of acute kidney injury in adult patients.

DATA RESOURCES

PubMed and other related databases were systematically searched from January 2012 to January 2023 to collect clinical guidelines and expert consensus on acute kidney injury. After summarizing the basic information, the methodological and reporting quality of the included guidelines or expert consensus was evaluated using the AGREE II and RIGHT tools.

RESULTS

A total of 8 CPGs from 6 countries and regions were included in this study, and the period was 2012-2023. In terms of methodological quality, 1 guideline was a level strongly recommended, and 6 were level B, generally recommended guidelines. While the evaluated guidelines demonstrated moderate overall reporting completeness, critical deficiencies persist in contextual transparency and quality assurance protocols, necessitating prioritized remediation in future iterations.

CONCLUSION

Our appraisal identifies the 2012 KDIGO guideline as the highest-quality AKI guidance framework currently available, which has driven global standardization of diagnostic criteria and management protocols. Our analysis reveals critical gaps in the practical applicability and transparency of current clinical practice guidelines, particularly regarding implementation strategies tailored to different populations, such as aging populations. Future iterations must prioritize demographic inclusivity, with explicit recommendations addressing the diagnostic challenges and management complexities of AKI among different populations.

摘要

目的

住院患者,尤其是重症监护病房(ICU)的患者,面临急性肾损伤(AKI)的重大风险。概述AKI诊断和治疗策略的临床实践指南(CPG)对医疗保健专业人员来说可能是有价值的工具,但其有效性取决于其质量。本研究旨在对涉及急性肾损伤的CPG的方法学和报告质量进行系统评价。

设计

对成人急性肾损伤管理的CPG进行系统评价。

数据来源

2012年1月至2023年1月对PubMed和其他相关数据库进行系统检索,以收集关于急性肾损伤的临床指南和专家共识。在总结基本信息后,使用AGREE II和RIGHT工具评估纳入指南或专家共识的方法学和报告质量。

结果

本研究共纳入来自6个国家和地区的8项CPG,时间跨度为2012 - 2023年。在方法学质量方面,1项指南为强烈推荐级别,6项为B级,一般推荐指南。虽然评估的指南总体报告完整性中等,但在背景透明度和质量保证方案方面仍存在严重不足,需要在未来版本中优先改进。

结论

我们的评估确定2012年KDIGO指南是目前可用的最高质量的AKI指导框架,它推动了诊断标准和管理方案的全球标准化。我们的分析揭示了当前临床实践指南在实际适用性和透明度方面的关键差距,特别是在针对不同人群(如老年人群)的实施策略方面。未来版本必须优先考虑人口包容性,明确提出针对不同人群中AKI的诊断挑战和管理复杂性的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7b3/12328445/ba13d06690da/fmed-12-1567359-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验