Suppr超能文献

老年尿失禁患者护理需求量表的编制及其信效度检验

Establishment of nursing needs scale for elderly patients with urinary incontinence and its reliability and validity test.

作者信息

Liu Xiangping, Pan Jing, Cai Silian

机构信息

Department of Gynaecology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 24;12:1602675. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1602675. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Urinary incontinence significantly impacts the quality of life of elderly patients, yet there is a lack of specific assessment tools for their nursing needs in the Chinese healthcare context. To develop a nursing needs scale for elderly patients with urinary incontinence and test its reliability and validity, aiming to provide a quantitative assessment tool for geriatric nursing practitioners and a scientific basis for quality-of-life interventions and standardized nursing for these patients, thus promoting the standardization of nursing practice.

METHODS

A comprehensive approach was adopted, including literature analysis, qualitative interviews, the Delphi method, pre-testing, and questionnaire surveys. Literature was retrieved from multiple databases and relevant websites to construct the initial scale framework and item pool. Purposive sampling was used to select 12 elderly patients with urinary incontinence (aged 60 years and above) and 10 medical staff for semi-structured qualitative interviews. Twenty-two experts participated in two rounds of Delphi consultations. Convenience sampling was applied to select 30 patients for pre-testing and 530 patients for the formal questionnaire survey. Content validity was evaluated using the Item-Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and Scale-Content Validity Index (S-CVI). Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test and Bartlett's test of sphericity were used to assess sampling adequacy. Factor loadings and total variance explained were calculated through exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to validate the factor structure. The data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 25.0 software to evaluate the scale's reliability and validity.

RESULTS

The initial scale had 48 items in 5 dimensions. After expert consultations and item screening, the pre-test version with 36 items was formed. Through exploratory factor analysis on 250 patients, 5 common factors were extracted, and one item was deleted, resulting in the final scale. Confirmatory factor analysis on 280 patients showed that the model fit well (χ/df = 1.412, RMSEA = 0.037, SRMR = 0.042, GFI = 0.901, TLI = 0.942, CFI = 0.947, NFI = 0.915, IFI = 0.948). The scale had good reliability (Cronbach's coefficient of the total scale was 0.901, split-half reliability was 0.865) and validity (content validity index S-CVI was 0.942).

CONCLUSION

The developed nursing needs scale for elderly patients with urinary incontinence consists of 35 items in 5 dimensions. The scale demonstrates good psychometric properties and can serve as an effective assessment tool in clinical practice. However, further research with larger samples and different regions is needed to improve the scale.

摘要

目的

尿失禁严重影响老年患者的生活质量,但在中国医疗背景下,缺乏针对其护理需求的特定评估工具。旨在开发一种老年尿失禁患者护理需求量表,并测试其信效度,为老年护理从业者提供定量评估工具,为这些患者的生活质量干预和标准化护理提供科学依据,从而促进护理实践的规范化。

方法

采用综合方法,包括文献分析、质性访谈、德尔菲法、预测试和问卷调查。从多个数据库和相关网站检索文献,构建初始量表框架和条目池。采用目的抽样法选取12例老年尿失禁患者(年龄60岁及以上)和10名医护人员进行半结构式质性访谈。22名专家参与两轮德尔菲咨询。采用便利抽样法选取30例患者进行预测试,530例患者进行正式问卷调查。使用条目内容效度指数(I-CVI)和量表内容效度指数(S-CVI)评估内容效度。采用Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO)检验和Bartlett球形检验评估抽样 adequacy。通过探索性因素分析计算因子载荷和解释的总方差。进行验证性因素分析以验证因子结构。使用SPSS 26.0和AMOS 25.0软件分析数据,评估量表的信效度。

结果

初始量表在5个维度上有48个条目。经过专家咨询和条目筛选,形成了包含36个条目的预测试版本。对250例患者进行探索性因素分析,提取出5个共同因子,删除1个条目,形成最终量表。对280例患者进行验证性因素分析,结果显示模型拟合良好(χ/df = 1.412,RMSEA = 0.037,SRMR = 0.042,GFI = 0.901,TLI = 0.942,CFI = 0.947,NFI = 0.915,IFI = 0.948)。该量表具有良好的信度(总量表的Cronbach系数为0.901,分半信度为0.865)和效度(内容效度指数S-CVI为0.942)。

结论

所开发的老年尿失禁患者护理需求量表由5个维度的35个条目组成。该量表具有良好的心理测量学特性,可作为临床实践中的有效评估工具。然而,需要进一步开展更大样本和不同地区的研究以完善该量表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a64/12328434/c7da7578e001/fmed-12-1602675-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验