Hargons Candice N, Thorpe Shemeka
Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University.
Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky.
Qual Psychol. 2025 Jun;12(2):234-248. doi: 10.1037/qup0000307. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
More recently, Black sexologists have advanced conceptual frameworks developed by humanities scholars using empirical research to address understudied areas such as sexual pleasure, intimacy, orgasm, and desire. Frameworks such as (Hargons & Thorpe, 2022) invite qualitative methodologists to investigate these constructs with more authenticity, pleasure, joy, sex-positive discourses, and a commitment to citing Black women; this is a radical pleasure disruption to scholastic anti-Blackness. In addition to the epistemologically liberating undertaking, there may also be opportunities to facilitate sexual healing-the movement toward an optimal sexual self-through the qualitative research process. Lee et al. (2023) noted healing research methodologies include six petals: maintains social justice ethics, adopts liberation methodologies, implements healing methods, embraces interdisciplinary approaches, catalyzes action, and promotes community accessibility. This qualitative (i.e., collaborative autoethnography and thematic analysis) study used the healing methods framework to examine how researchers and participants in the Big Sex Study articulated the healing and liberatory benefits of engaging in the qualitative phases of a #HotGirlScience, community-based participatory action research project. Results of this study showed that Black participants and research team members felt liberated, heard, valued, reassured, and experienced heightened curiosity and shifts in their sexual perspectives. Throughout the interviews, participants reported four of five petals in the healing methodologies framework, with Petal 3 being the most frequently reported. Implications for the use of healing methodologies in Black sexology are discussed.
最近,黑人性学家采用实证研究推进了人文学者所构建的概念框架,以探讨性快感、亲密关系、性高潮和欲望等研究不足的领域。诸如(哈贡斯和索普,2022年)之类的框架邀请定性方法论者以更真实、愉悦、积极的性话语以及引用黑人女性的承诺来研究这些概念;这是对学术上反黑人现象的一种激进的愉悦颠覆。除了在认识论上具有解放意义的事业之外,通过定性研究过程,或许还有机会促进性治愈——朝着最佳性自我的方向发展。李等人(2023年)指出,治愈研究方法包括六个方面:秉持社会正义伦理、采用解放性方法、实施治愈方法、采用跨学科方法、催化行动以及促进社区可及性。这项定性研究(即合作性自我民族志和主题分析)运用治愈方法框架,来考察“大型性研究”中的研究人员和参与者如何阐述参与一个基于社区的参与性行动研究项目#HotGirlScience定性阶段所带来的治愈和解放益处。这项研究结果表明,黑人参与者和研究团队成员感到获得了解放、被倾听、被重视、安心,并且体验到了更强的好奇心以及性观念的转变。在整个访谈过程中,参与者报告了治愈方法框架中五个方面中的四个方面情况,其中第三个方面是被提及最多的。本文讨论了在黑人性学中使用治愈方法的意义。