Clark C R, White A A
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985 Dec;67(9):1340-8.
The treatment of fractures of the dens is often inadequate, and surgeons are divided in their opinions regarding the best surgical management of these potentially serious injuries. Because of these concerns, the Cervical Spine Research Society conducted a multicenter survey of its membership regarding the management of these fractures. Fractures of the dens can be effectively classified according to the anatomical level of the fracture, as described by Anderson and d'Alonzo. We have found that the degree of angulation and amount of displacement are also important factors. Fractures occurring at the junction of the dens with the vertebral body (Type-II fractures) were found to be the most troublesome. The initial management of these fractures with a halo device was successful in only 68 per cent; however, posterior cervical fusion was successful in 96 per cent, and that appears to be the treatment of choice. Fractures extending into the vertebral body (Type-III injuries) were found not to be as benign as has been reported. Malunion and non-union occurred in patients with this injury who were treated with an orthosis alone, and a halo device or surgery may be indicated for unstable lesions.
齿突骨折的治疗往往并不充分,外科医生对于这些潜在严重损伤的最佳手术治疗方法存在分歧。出于这些担忧,颈椎研究协会对其成员进行了一项关于这些骨折治疗方法的多中心调查。齿突骨折可根据骨折的解剖部位进行有效分类,如安德森和达隆佐所描述的那样。我们发现,成角程度和移位量也是重要因素。齿突与椎体交界处发生的骨折(Ⅱ型骨折)被认为是最棘手的。这些骨折最初采用头环装置治疗,成功率仅为68%;然而,颈椎后路融合术的成功率为96%,这似乎是首选的治疗方法。延伸至椎体的骨折(Ⅲ型损伤)并不像之前报道的那么良性。仅用矫形器治疗的此类损伤患者会出现畸形愈合和不愈合,对于不稳定的病变可能需要使用头环装置或进行手术。