• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过基于信息的移动健康干预(WalkToJoy)改善与体育活动的情感关联:概念验证研究。

Improving Affective Associations With Physical Activity via a Message-Based mHealth Intervention (WalkToJoy): Proof-of-Concept Study.

作者信息

Choi Soo Ji Serisse, Hung Pei-Yao, Liu Mengyun, Dempsey Walter, Newman Mark W, Klasnja Predrag

机构信息

School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e75792. doi: 10.2196/75792.

DOI:10.2196/75792
PMID:40779759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12374139/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional mobile health interventions for physical activity (PA) primarily rely on reflective self-regulatory processes, often neglecting the role of affective associations in sustaining long-term engagement. The WalkToJoy intervention addresses this gap by applying the affective-reflective theory to enhance intrinsic motivation for PA among adults aged ≥40 years through affective message framing, evaluative conditioning, and belief updating.

OBJECTIVE

This proof-of-concept study evaluated the feasibility of the message-based WalkToJoy intervention package and examined the impact of its 3 components-walking suggestion prompts, salience messages, and planning prompts-on affective and behavioral outcomes related to walking.

METHODS

We conducted a fully remote, 6-week full factorial experiment with an embedded microrandomized trial (MRT) involving 49 adults aged ≥40 years. Statistical analyses, including paired t tests and generalized estimating equations, assessed pretest-posttest changes and the effects of smile-inducing walking suggestion prompts with short animated images (GIF images), salience messages, and planning prompts on weekly affective measures and daily step counts. In addition, MRT analyses evaluated the proximal effects of these components. Poststudy interviews were thematically analyzed to contextualize participants' experiences and engagement with the intervention.

RESULTS

Significant pretest-posttest improvements were observed across affective outcomes on a 7-point Likert scale-affective attitudes improved by 0.547 points (P<.001), affective valuations improved by 0.718 points (P<.001), affective reflection improved by 0.692 points (P<.001), and anticipated affect improved by 0.692 points (P<.001). While the average daily steps showed a nonsignificant pretest-posttest increase of 80 steps (P=.79), further analysis revealed an increase of 506 steps (P=.07) when comparing baseline to the average of weeks 4 to 6. Among the intervention components, GIF prompts significantly increased anticipated affect by 0.345 points (P=.046) and average daily step count by 1834 steps (P=.05) compared to identical text-only prompts. However, MRT analysis found no significant increase in 4-hour step counts following the walking suggestion prompts (P=.55), which was explained by qualitative findings suggesting that participants interpreted messages as flexible day-long reminders rather than immediate calls to action. Salience and planning prompts did not yield substantial quantitative effects but were positively received by participants for promoting mindfulness and personalized engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

The WalkToJoy intervention is a feasible and promising approach for improving affective associations with walking. Walking suggestion prompts were particularly effective in boosting engagement and mitigating message fatigue, highlighting the potential of affect-driven interventions to enhance PA motivation and adherence.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/3f05affef18a/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/5a0a1f33be8f/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/e0090a806d8f/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/cc38b2648588/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/5927e971d82a/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/847c593a88f1/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/9f4227a2c0e6/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/3f05affef18a/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/5a0a1f33be8f/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/e0090a806d8f/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/cc38b2648588/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/5927e971d82a/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/847c593a88f1/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/9f4227a2c0e6/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af8/12374139/3f05affef18a/jmir_v27i1e75792_fig7.jpg
摘要

背景

传统的身体活动(PA)移动健康干预主要依赖于反思性自我调节过程,常常忽视情感联想在维持长期参与中的作用。“走向快乐”干预通过应用情感 - 反思理论,通过情感信息框架、评价性条件作用和信念更新,增强40岁及以上成年人对PA的内在动机,从而解决了这一差距。

目的

这项概念验证研究评估了基于信息的“走向快乐”干预方案的可行性,并检验了其三个组成部分——步行建议提示、显著性信息和计划提示——对与步行相关的情感和行为结果的影响。

方法

我们进行了一项为期6周的完全远程全因子实验,并嵌入了微随机试验(MRT),涉及49名40岁及以上的成年人。统计分析,包括配对t检验和广义估计方程,评估了前后测变化以及带有简短动画图像(GIF图像)的诱导微笑步行建议提示、显著性信息和计划提示对每周情感测量和每日步数的影响。此外,MRT分析评估了这些组成部分的近端效应。对研究后的访谈进行了主题分析,以了解参与者的体验以及他们对干预的参与情况。

结果

在7点李克特量表上的情感结果中观察到前后测有显著改善——情感态度提高了0.547分(P<.001),情感评价提高了0.718分(P<.001),情感反思提高了0.692分(P<.001),预期情感提高了0.692分(P<.001)。虽然每日平均步数在前后测中增加了80步,但差异不显著(P = 0.79),进一步分析显示,将基线与第4至6周的平均值进行比较时,步数增加了506步(P = 0.07)。在干预组成部分中,与仅包含相同文本的提示相比,GIF提示使预期情感显著增加了0.345分(P = 0.046),每日平均步数增加了1834步(P = 0.05)。然而,MRT分析发现,步行建议提示后4小时的步数没有显著增加(P = 0.55),定性研究结果表明,参与者将信息解释为灵活的全天提醒,而不是立即行动的呼吁,这解释了这一现象。显著性和计划提示没有产生实质性的定量影响,但在促进正念和个性化参与方面受到参与者的积极认可。

结论

“走向快乐”干预是一种可行且有前景的方法,可改善与步行相关的情感联想。步行建议提示在提高参与度和减轻信息疲劳方面特别有效,突出了情感驱动干预在增强PA动机和坚持方面的潜力。

相似文献

1
Improving Affective Associations With Physical Activity via a Message-Based mHealth Intervention (WalkToJoy): Proof-of-Concept Study.通过基于信息的移动健康干预(WalkToJoy)改善与体育活动的情感关联:概念验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e75792. doi: 10.2196/75792.
2
Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses.利用手机短信促进慢性病自我管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007459.pub2.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
5
The Impact of an Adaptive mHealth Intervention on Improving Patient-Provider Health Care Communication: Secondary Analysis of the DIAMANTE Trial.一种适应性移动健康干预对改善医患医疗保健沟通的影响:DIAMANTE试验的二次分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jul 17;13:e64296. doi: 10.2196/64296.
6
The Impact of a Gamified Intervention on Daily Steps in Real-Life Conditions: Retrospective Analysis of 4800 Individuals.游戏化干预对现实生活中日常步数的影响:对 4800 人的回顾性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 12;26:e47116. doi: 10.2196/47116.
7
Mobile phone messaging reminders for attendance at healthcare appointments.用于提醒出席医疗预约的手机短信
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 5;2013(12):CD007458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007458.pub3.
8
Boosting Physical Activity Among Individuals With Low Engagement Through Double-Point Incentives in a Community-Based mHealth Intervention: Retrospective Observational Study.在基于社区的移动健康干预中通过双点激励提高低参与度个体的身体活动水平:回顾性观察研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Aug 21;13:e66227. doi: 10.2196/66227.
9
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
10
Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care.用于预防性医疗保健的手机短信服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007457.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Enjoy exercise more: The effects of dual-channel evaluative conditioning on implicit attitudes toward exercise.更喜欢锻炼:双通道评价条件作用对锻炼内隐态度的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2023 Nov;33(11):2381-2389. doi: 10.1111/sms.14465. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
2
The association between daily step count and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a meta-analysis.每日步数与全因和心血管死亡率的关系:荟萃分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Dec 21;30(18):1975-1985. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad229.
3
Affective Response During Real-World Physical Activity as an Intervention Mediator.
现实世界体力活动中的情感反应作为干预中介。
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2023 Oct 1;51(4):140-149. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000321. Epub 2023 May 17.
4
Physical Activity Among Adults Aged 18 and Over: United States, 2020.成年人身体活动:2020 年美国
NCHS Data Brief. 2022 Aug(443):1-8.
5
Measurement of Adherence to mHealth Physical Activity Interventions and Exploration of the Factors That Affect the Adherence: Scoping Review and Proposed Framework.测量移动健康体力活动干预措施的依从性并探索影响其依从性的因素:范围综述和拟议框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 8;24(6):e30817. doi: 10.2196/30817.
6
Challenges in Participant Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Health Apps: Literature Review.使用移动健康应用程序在参与者参与度和留存率方面面临的挑战:文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 26;24(4):e35120. doi: 10.2196/35120.
7
The microrandomized trial for developing digital interventions: Experimental design and data analysis considerations.用于开发数字干预措施的微随机试验:实验设计和数据分析注意事项。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Oct;27(5):874-894. doi: 10.1037/met0000283. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
8
The relationships between step count and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events: A dose-response meta-analysis.步数与全因死亡率和心血管事件之间的关系:剂量反应荟萃分析。
J Sport Health Sci. 2021 Dec;10(6):620-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
Personalized mobile technologies for lifestyle behavior change: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.个性化移动技术在生活方式行为改变中的应用:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106532. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106532. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
10
Self-Regulation Without Force: Can Awareness Leverage Reward to Drive Behavior Change?无需强制的自我调节:意识能否利用奖励来推动行为改变?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;15(6):1382-1399. doi: 10.1177/1745691620931460. Epub 2020 Aug 28.