Bansal Sandeep, Pagidas Kelly
Department of Medical Education Anne Burnett Marion School of Medicine, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
LSU Health School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 8;25(1):1154. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07733-3.
The strengn for medical school reflects a student's perseverance in continuing medical training, regardless of personal sacrifices and academic or situational setbacks. Recognizing the patterns of changes in the strength of motivation may be beneficial in pinpointing the time(s) when students struggle to adapt to the rigors of the training, allowing educators to provide appropriate support. We examined the strength of motivation longitudinally and its association with examination performance during the basic science and core clerkship periods.
A prospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted at the Burnett School of Medicine from November 2020 through November 2023. First-year medical students were enrolled in the study (n = 51). The Strength of Motivation for Medical School-Revised version (SMMS-R) questionnaire, which consists of three subscales (Willingness to Sacrifice, Readiness to Start, and Persistence), was used at four distinct points during the preclinical and core clinical training. We compared the SMMS-R scores across four measurement points. Average scores from sets of summative assessments corresponding to the SMMS-R data collection time points were used to study correlation with SMMS-R scores.
A repeated-measures ANOVA with Wilks' lambda determined a significant effect of time on the mean composite SMMS-R scores (p < 0.001), with a medium effect size ([Formula: see text] = 0.11). Subscale scores of Willingness to Sacrifice and Persistence showed significant variation in the strength of motivation across time with a medium effect size, p = 0.015, [Formula: see text] = 0.07 and p = 0.007, [Formula: see text] = 0.08, respectively. Examination performance varied significantly over time (p < 0.001), with a large effect size ([Formula: see text] = 0.16). However, no significant correlation was found between the SMMS-R and examination scores.
Students often enter medical school with high levels of motivation, yet their strength of motivation may fluctuate as they encounter the realities and rigor of the curriculum. Results from our study revealed a significant decline in the strength of motivation and examination performance as medical students advanced in basic science and core clinical training. Our findings can inform the implementation of student-supporting mechanisms that could help sustain original (or higher) levels of strength of motivation as medical students advance in their training.
医学院学习动力的强度反映了学生在继续医学培训过程中的毅力,无论个人牺牲以及学业或情境挫折如何。识别动力强度的变化模式可能有助于确定学生在努力适应严格培训时的艰难时期,从而使教育工作者能够提供适当的支持。我们纵向研究了动力强度及其与基础科学和核心临床实习阶段考试成绩的关联。
2020年11月至2023年11月在伯纳特医学院进行了一项前瞻性纵向队列研究。一年级医学生参与了该研究(n = 51)。在临床前和核心临床培训的四个不同时间点使用了医学院学习动力强度修订版问卷(SMMS-R),该问卷由三个子量表(牺牲意愿、准备开始和坚持)组成。我们比较了四个测量点的SMMS-R分数。使用与SMMS-R数据收集时间点相对应的一组总结性评估的平均分数来研究与SMMS-R分数的相关性。
采用带有威尔克斯lambda的重复测量方差分析确定时间对SMMS-R综合平均分数有显著影响(p < 0.001),效应量中等([公式:见正文] = 0.11)。牺牲意愿和坚持子量表的分数显示动力强度随时间有显著变化,效应量中等,p = 0.015,[公式:见正文] = 0.07和p = 0.007,[公式:见正文] = 0. = 0.08。考试成绩随时间有显著变化(p < 0.001),效应量较大([公式:见正文] = 0.16)。然而,未发现SMMS-R与考试成绩之间存在显著相关性。
学生进入医学院时通常动力水平较高,但随着他们面对课程的实际情况和严格要求,其动力强度可能会波动。我们的研究结果显示,随着医学生在基础科学和核心临床培训中的推进,动力强度和考试成绩显著下降。我们研究结果可为实施学生支持机制提供参考,这些机制有助于在医学生培训过程中维持最初(或更高)的动力强度水平。