Metakides Clio, Pielemeier Lena, Lytras Theodore, Mytilinaios Dimitrios G, Themistocleous Sophia C, Pieridi Chryso, Tsioutis Constantinos, Johnson Elizabeth O, Ntourakis Dimitrios, Nikas Ilias P
School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Kenhub GmbH, Leipzig, Germany.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 28;10:1214320. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1214320. eCollection 2023.
To investigate medical students' burnout and motivation levels in each of the six years of their studies during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify independent predictors of burnout and motivation.
An anonymous cross-sectional survey was sent to the students of all six years within our school. Burnout was measured with the adapted Oldenburg Burnout Inventory questionnaire (OLBI-S) and motivation with the updated Strength of Motivation for Medical School (SMMS-R) questionnaire. Univariate analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and Spearman's correlation, while multivariable analysis with linear regression models.
A total of 333 medical students (52% of student body) responded. Higher burnout levels correlated with lower motivation to study medicine (rho = -0.30, < 0.001). Burnout levels differed between the six years of medical studies, peaking in years two and four whereas being the lowest in year one ( = 0.01). Motivation levels differed significantly as well, peaking in years one and four whereas being the lowest in years five and six ( = 0.012). In the multivariable linear regression models, being a female ( = 2.22, = 0.016), studying in the fourth year vs. first year ( = 2.54, = 0.049), having a perceived beginner/intermediate vs. advanced/expert technology level ( = 2.05, = 0.032) and a perceived poor school support system ( = 6.35, < 0.001) were independently associated with higher burnout levels. Furthermore, studying in the fifth year vs. first year ( = -5.17, = 0.019) and a perceived poor school support system ( = -3.09, = 0.01) were independently associated with a reduced motivation to study medicine.
Our study highlighted potential areas for intervention to decrease the rate of burnout and low motivation among medical students. However, further research is needed to unravel the full effect of the pandemic on medical students.
调查新冠疫情期间医学生在六年学习过程中的倦怠和动机水平,并确定倦怠和动机的独立预测因素。
向我校所有六个年级的学生发送了一份匿名横断面调查问卷。使用改编后的奥尔登堡倦怠量表问卷(OLBI-S)测量倦怠,使用更新后的医学院学习动机强度问卷(SMMS-R)测量动机。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Spearman相关性进行单变量分析,同时使用线性回归模型进行多变量分析。
共有333名医学生(占学生总数的52%)做出回应。较高的倦怠水平与较低的学医动机相关(rho = -0.30,<0.001)。医学学习的六年中倦怠水平存在差异,在第二年和第四年达到峰值,而在第一年最低(=0.01)。动机水平也存在显著差异,在第一年和第四年达到峰值,而在第五年和第六年最低(=0.012)。在多变量线性回归模型中,女性(=2.22,=0.016)、与第一年相比在第四年学习(=2.54,=0.049)、感知技术水平为初学者/中级与高级/专家相比(=2.05,=0.032)以及感知学校支持系统较差(=6.35,<0.001)与较高的倦怠水平独立相关。此外,与第一年相比在第五年学习(= -5.17,=0.019)以及感知学校支持系统较差(= -3.09,=0.01)与学医动机降低独立相关。
我们的研究突出了潜在的干预领域,以降低医学生的倦怠率和低动机水平。然而,需要进一步研究以阐明疫情对医学生的全面影响。