Fraga Iuri Fazolin, de Moraes Matheus Henrique Morato, Menezes Isabella Silva, Pereira Junior Wanderlei Malaquias, Lahr Francisco Antonio Rocco, Christoforo André Luis, Monteiro Sergio Neves, de Azevedo Afonso Rangel Garcez
Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Catalão, Catalão, Brazil.
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 9;15(1):29159. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12960-1.
Wood is widely used in structural systems worldwide due to its mechanical properties and sustainability. In Brazil, its application is relative modest compared to Northern Hemisphere countries yet remains prevalent in roof structures, some of which date back to the twentieth century. Over time, empirical assumptions have influenced the design of timber roof structures has been observed, such as those related to roof slope. Many builders assume that lower slopes reduce material consumption since shorter elements are required. However, the magnitude of forces on the members is inversely proportional to the slope, potentially resulting in oversized structures. To assess the validity of these assumptions, this study investigates the optimal slope and appropriate strength class for a Fink truss with a 10-m span, employing the Firefly Algorithm for optimization. The results indicate that the D20 strength class, which has a characteristic compressive strength of 20 MPa, was optimal, reducing timber volume by up to 32.4% compared to higher strength classes, which significantly decreases structural mass and column loads. Specifically, optimal slopes ranged between 10° and 15°, achieving a total timber volume below 0.20 m3. It was observed that lower slopes (e.g., 5°) increased material volume by up to 324%, compared to the optimal slope configuration (typically between 10° and 15°), primarily due to strength and stability requirements. Similarly, very high slopes (above 36°) led to an average volume increase of approximately 250%. Furthermore, adopting a cross-sectional dimensions of 75 × 75 mm provided an effective solution to control slenderness within regulatory limits, ensuring both structural efficiency and economical usage of timber.
由于其机械性能和可持续性,木材在全球的结构系统中被广泛使用。在巴西,与北半球国家相比,其应用相对较少,但在屋顶结构中仍然很普遍,其中一些可以追溯到20世纪。随着时间的推移,经验假设已经影响了木屋顶结构的设计,例如那些与屋顶坡度有关的假设。许多建筑商认为较低的坡度会减少材料消耗,因为所需的构件较短。然而,构件上的力的大小与坡度成反比,这可能导致结构尺寸过大。为了评估这些假设的有效性,本研究采用萤火虫算法进行优化,研究了跨度为10米的芬克桁架的最佳坡度和合适的强度等级。结果表明,特征抗压强度为20MPa的D20强度等级是最佳的,与更高强度等级相比,木材体积减少了32.4%,这显著降低了结构质量和柱荷载。具体而言,最佳坡度在10°至15°之间,总木材体积低于0.20立方米。据观察,与最佳坡度配置(通常在10°至15°之间)相比,较低的坡度(例如5°)会使材料体积增加324%,这主要是由于强度和稳定性要求。同样,非常高的坡度(超过36°)会导致平均体积增加约250%。此外,采用75×75mm的横截面尺寸提供了一种有效的解决方案,可将细长比控制在规定范围内,确保木材的结构效率和经济使用。