• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Navigating Discharge From Early Intervention in Psychosis Services: A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Service Users and Carers.探索精神病早期干预服务的出院流程:对服务使用者和照顾者经历的质性探索
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70375. doi: 10.1111/hex.70375.
2
Supporting people in Early Intervention in Psychosis services: the role of primary care.支持精神病早期干预服务中的人群:初级保健的作用。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jun 20;74(suppl 1):bjgp24X737541. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X737541.
3
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Digital augmentation of aftercare for patients with anorexia nervosa: the TRIANGLE RCT and economic evaluation.神经性厌食症患者后期护理的数字化增强:TRIANGLE随机对照试验及经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(31):1-162. doi: 10.3310/ADLS3672.
8
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
Staying afloat on a realm of shifting sands: carers navigating palliative care in their rural settings.在变幻莫测的领域中保持不沉:农村地区的护理人员在姑息治疗中艰难前行。
Rural Remote Health. 2025 Jul;25(3):9343. doi: 10.22605/RRH9343. Epub 2025 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of providing care for physical health in severe mental illness on informal carers: a qualitative study.为严重精神疾病患者提供身体健康护理对非专业照顾者的影响:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 6;24(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05864-3.
2
Comparing interventions for early psychosis: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.早期精神病干预措施的比较:一项系统评价与成分网络荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 14;70:102537. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102537. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Collaboration across the primary and specialist care interface in Early Intervention in Psychosis services: a qualitative study.精神病早期干预服务中初级保健和专科保健界面的协作:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Sep 26;74(747):e709-e716. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0558. Print 2024 Oct.
4
Predictors of positive patient-reported outcomes from 'Early Intervention in Psychosis': a national cross-sectional study.《精神病早期干预的患者报告结局阳性的预测因素:一项全国性横断面研究》。
BMJ Ment Health. 2023 Aug;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300716.
5
What happens after early intervention? Mapping early intervention in psychosis care pathways in the 12 months after discharge.早期干预后会发生什么?出院后 12 个月内精神病早期干预护理途径的映射。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;18(1):49-57. doi: 10.1111/eip.13433. Epub 2023 May 23.
6
'Imposter participants' in online qualitative research, a new and increasing threat to data integrity?在线定性研究中的“冒名参与者”,对数据完整性而言是一种新的且日益严重的威胁?
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):941-944. doi: 10.1111/hex.13724. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
7
Gatekeepers, wizards, and a mutual appreciation of each other's kingdoms.守门人、巫师以及对彼此领域的相互欣赏。
BMJ. 2021 Dec 14;375:n3005. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n3005.
8
Specialised early intervention teams for recent-onset psychosis.针对近期发病精神病的专业早期干预团队。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 2;11(11):CD013288. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013288.pub2.
9
Moving on from early intervention for psychosis services: Service user perspectives on the facilitators and barriers of transition.从精神病早期干预服务转移:服务使用者对过渡促进因素和障碍的看法。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;13(6):1396-1403. doi: 10.1111/eip.12780. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
10
Barriers and facilitators to "moving on" from early intervention in psychosis services.从精神病早期干预服务中“继续前进”的障碍和促进因素。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;13(4):914-921. doi: 10.1111/eip.12708. Epub 2018 Jul 27.

探索精神病早期干预服务的出院流程:对服务使用者和照顾者经历的质性探索

Navigating Discharge From Early Intervention in Psychosis Services: A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Service Users and Carers.

作者信息

Rickett Michelle, Kingstone Tom, Gupta Veenu, Shiers David, French Paul, Lennox Belinda, Penington Ed, Williams Ryan, Hoppe Isobel, Chew-Graham Carolyn A

机构信息

School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.

Department of Psychology, Durham University, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70375. doi: 10.1111/hex.70375.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70375
PMID:40783945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12335836/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services in England offer up to 3 years' time-limited support to people experiencing early psychosis. Service users (SUs) are discharged to primary care, a community mental health team (CMHT), or other specialist mental health service. The aim of this study is to explore the SU and carer journey through discharge from EIP and into the early post-discharge period.

METHODS

Qualitative longitudinal study comprising semi-structured interviews with SUs and carers at, or shortly after, discharge from EIP, and follow-up interviews with SUs 6-11 months later. Data collection conducted between January 2023-September 2024 and informed by information power. Data were thematically analysed by a multidisciplinary team.

RESULTS

SUs and carers expressed their desire to be actively involved in EIP discharge planning and decision-making. They contrasted close relationships with EIP practitioners with inaccessibility of care and difficulties navigating healthcare systems after discharge. Some SUs described feelings of abandonment and expressed a wish for transitional support, and proactive, relationship-based care post-discharge. Carers played an important role as patient advocates but were rarely offered support themselves.

CONCLUSION

Improved collaboration is needed between SUs, carers and primary care/CMHT practitioners in the build-up to EIP discharge. There should be proactive contact from primary care at the point of discharge and in the early post-discharge period. Carer needs are often overlooked; primary care could utilise the 'carers register' and proactively offer support.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patient and carer involvement and engagement was key to all stages of this study. The research team met regularly with our two co-investigators with lived experience (as a service user and a carer), who contributed to data analysis and writing this paper. We worked closely with our patient and carer advisory group, EXTEND-ing, throughout the research process. They helped formulate research questions, co-designed topic guides and participant information sheets, and contributed to data analysis and interpretation.

摘要

引言

英国的早期精神病干预(EIP)服务为患有早期精神病的人提供长达3年的限时支持。服务使用者(SU)出院后会转至初级保健机构、社区精神卫生团队(CMHT)或其他专业精神卫生服务机构。本研究的目的是探索服务使用者和照顾者从EIP出院直至出院后早期阶段的经历。

方法

定性纵向研究,包括在服务使用者和照顾者从EIP出院时或出院后不久进行半结构化访谈,并在6 - 11个月后对服务使用者进行随访访谈。数据收集于2023年1月至2024年9月期间进行,并依据信息力开展。数据由多学科团队进行主题分析。

结果

服务使用者和照顾者表示希望积极参与EIP出院计划和决策制定。他们将与EIP从业者的密切关系与出院后难以获得护理以及在医疗系统中导航的困难进行了对比。一些服务使用者描述了被遗弃的感觉,并表达了对过渡性支持以及出院后基于关系的积极护理的愿望。照顾者作为患者倡导者发挥了重要作用,但他们自己很少得到支持。

结论

在EIP出院前,服务使用者、照顾者与初级保健/CMHT从业者之间需要加强合作。出院时及出院后早期,初级保健机构应主动联系。照顾者需求常常被忽视;初级保健机构可利用“照顾者登记册”并主动提供支持。

患者或公众贡献

患者和照顾者的参与和介入是本研究所有阶段的关键。研究团队定期与我们两位有实际经验的共同研究者(一位是服务使用者,一位是照顾者)会面,他们参与了数据分析并撰写本文。在整个研究过程中,我们与患者和照顾者咨询小组EXTEND-ing密切合作。他们帮助制定研究问题,共同设计主题指南和参与者信息表,并参与数据分析和解读。