• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神病早期干预的患者报告结局阳性的预测因素:一项全国性横断面研究》。

Predictors of positive patient-reported outcomes from 'Early Intervention in Psychosis': a national cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK

College Centre for Quality Improvement, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Ment Health. 2023 Aug;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300716.

DOI:10.1136/bmjment-2023-300716
PMID:37541700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10577709/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The components of care delivered by Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services vary, but the impact on patient experience is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate associations between components of care provided by EIP services in England and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

2374 patients from EIP services in England were surveyed during the National Clinical Audit of Psychosis. Participants were asked about the care they received, and completed the 'Patient Global Impressions' Scale (rating whether their mental health had improved), and 'Friends and Family Test' (rating whether they would recommend their service). Information about service structure was obtained from service providers. We analysed associations between outcomes and components of care using multilevel regression.

FINDINGS

The majority of participants were likely to recommend the treatment they had received (89.8%), and felt that their mental health had improved (89.0%). Participants from services where care coordinators had larger case loads were less likely to recommend their care. Participants were more likely to recommend their care if they had been offered cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis, family therapy or targeted interventions for carers. Participants were more likely to report that their mental health had improved if they had been offered cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis or targeted interventions for carers.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific components of EIP care were associated with improved patient reported outcomes. Psychosocial interventions and carer support may be particularly important in optimising outcomes for patients.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These findings emphasise the need for small case load sizes and comprehensive packages of treatment in EIP services.

摘要

背景

早期精神病干预(EIP)服务提供的护理内容各不相同,但对患者体验的影响尚不清楚。

目的

调查英格兰 EIP 服务提供的护理内容与患者报告结果之间的关联。

方法

在全国精神病临床审计中,对英格兰 EIP 服务的 2374 名患者进行了调查。参与者被问及他们所接受的护理,并完成了“患者总体印象量表”(评估他们的心理健康是否有所改善)和“朋友和家人测试”(评估他们是否会推荐他们的服务)。从服务提供者那里获得有关服务结构的信息。我们使用多水平回归分析了结果与护理内容之间的关联。

结果

大多数参与者很可能会推荐他们所接受的治疗(89.8%),并认为他们的心理健康状况有所改善(89.0%)。护理协调员的病例量较大的服务中的参与者不太可能推荐他们的护理。如果为参与者提供了针对精神病的认知行为疗法、家庭治疗或针对照顾者的针对性干预措施,他们更有可能推荐他们的护理。如果为参与者提供了针对精神病的认知行为疗法或针对照顾者的针对性干预措施,他们更有可能报告自己的心理健康状况有所改善。

结论

EIP 护理的特定内容与改善患者报告的结果有关。心理社会干预和照顾者支持可能对优化患者的治疗效果尤为重要。

临床意义

这些发现强调了 EIP 服务中需要小的病例量和综合治疗方案。

相似文献

1
Predictors of positive patient-reported outcomes from 'Early Intervention in Psychosis': a national cross-sectional study.《精神病早期干预的患者报告结局阳性的预测因素:一项全国性横断面研究》。
BMJ Ment Health. 2023 Aug;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300716.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Early intervention for psychosis.精神病的早期干预
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD004718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004718.pub2.
4
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Family-centred interventions for Indigenous early childhood well-being by primary healthcare services.以初级医疗保健服务为中心的家庭干预措施,促进土著儿童早期的身心健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 13;12(12):CD012463. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012463.pub2.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Critical components of 'Early Intervention in Psychosis': national retrospective cohort study.“精神病早期干预”的关键组成部分:全国性回顾性队列研究
Br J Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 26:1-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2025.126.
10
[Specialised first-episode psychosis services: a systematic review of the literature].[专科首发精神病服务:文献系统综述]
Encephale. 2011 May;37 Suppl 1:S66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating Discharge From Early Intervention in Psychosis Services: A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Service Users and Carers.探索精神病早期干预服务的出院流程:对服务使用者和照顾者经历的质性探索
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70375. doi: 10.1111/hex.70375.
2
WeARTolerance: Evaluating the impact of an arts-based program to reduce mental health-related stigma in young people.艺术容忍度:评估一项以艺术为基础的项目对减少年轻人心理健康相关污名化的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0314994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314994. eCollection 2024.
3
Investigating inequalities in patient outcomes for first-episode psychosis.调查首发精神病患者治疗结果的不平等现象。
Br J Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;225(6):556-562. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.132.

本文引用的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Measures Used in Early Intervention Services for Psychosis.精神病早期干预服务中使用的措施的范围综述。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 May 1;74(5):523-533. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100506. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
2
Schizophrenia.精神分裂症。
Lancet. 2022 Jan 29;399(10323):473-486. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01730-X.
3
Using epidemiological evidence to forecast population need for early treatment programmes in mental health: a generalisable Bayesian prediction methodology applied to and validated for first-episode psychosis in England.利用流行病学证据预测心理健康早期治疗计划的人口需求:一种可推广的贝叶斯预测方法,应用于并验证了英格兰的首发精神病。
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;219(1):383-391. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.18. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
The relationship between stigma and subjective quality of life in psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.精神病患者污名与主观生活质量的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Apr;85:102003. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102003. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
5
Mental health and caregiving experiences of family carers supporting people with psychosis.精神健康与照顾精神病患者的家庭照顾者的经历。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021 Jan 8;30:e3. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020001067.
6
Specialised early intervention teams (extended time) for recent-onset psychosis.针对近期发病精神病的专业早期干预团队(延长时间)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 2;11(11):CD013287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013287.pub2.
7
Worldwide implementation of clinical services for the prevention of psychosis: The IEPA early intervention in mental health survey.全球范围内预防精神病的临床服务实施情况:IEPA 心理健康早期干预调查。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;14(6):741-750. doi: 10.1111/eip.12950. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
8
Sex Differences in Clinical and Functional Outcomes among Patients Treated in an Early Intervention Service for Psychotic Disorders: An Observational Study.精神障碍早期干预服务中治疗的患者的临床和功能结局的性别差异:一项观察性研究。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;64(10):708-717. doi: 10.1177/0706743719854069. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
9
Cost-effectiveness of early intervention in psychosis: systematic review.精神病早期干预的成本效益:系统评价。
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;215(1):388-394. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.298. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
10
Patient centric measures for a patient centric era: Agreement and convergent between ratings on The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale and the Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-S) scale in bipolar and major depressive disorder.以患者为中心的时代的患者中心措施:双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症患者的整体改善印象量表(PGI-I)评分与临床整体印象-改善量表(CGI-S)评分之间的一致性和趋同。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;53:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 30.