Feng Yan, Jia Ji-Ming, Cheng Yong-Xiang, Lin Jing, Zhang Xin-Yue, Wang Yi-Zheng, Zuo You-Bo
Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Department of Anesthesiology, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Aug 5;19:6777-6787. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S531034. eCollection 2025.
Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy, characterized by significant surgical trauma, profound stress responses, prolonged duration, and high anesthetic requirements, may lead to delayed recovery or emergence agitation. Whether remimazolam and propofol combined with flumazenil reversal can accelerate the recovery and enhance hemodynamic stability remains controversial.
Fifty patients aged 18-70 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III and Child-Pugh classification A or B undergoing elective laparoscopic partial hepatectomy were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam combined with propofol group (RP group) or the propofol group (P group). Both groups received intravenous sufentanil and cisatracurium for induction, followed by either remimazolam-propofol with flumazenil reversal or propofol alone. Emergence parameters, including time to obey verbal commands, BIS over 80, and tracheal tube removal were recorded. The Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at predefined intervals, hemodynamics, and adverse events were recorded.
The time to obey verbal commands (), BIS over 80 (), and tracheal tube removal () were all significantly shorter in the RP group than in the P group. The SAS score after 30 min () in the PACU was significantly higher, but the VAS score after 15 min () and 30 min () in the PACU, were significantly lower in the RP group than in the P group. MAP at T1 () was significantly lower in the P group than in the RP group. In addition, the RP group demonstrated reduced post-induction hypotension, required no postoperative rescue analgesia, and reported no emergence agitation.
Compared to propofol alone, remimazolam-propofol with flumazenil reversal provides faster and more complete recovery, superior hemodynamic stability perioperatively, and reduced analgesic requirements in laparoscopic partial hepatectomy patients.
腹腔镜肝部分切除术具有手术创伤大、应激反应强烈、手术时间长和麻醉要求高的特点,可能导致恢复延迟或苏醒期躁动。瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚联合氟马西尼进行拮抗是否能加速恢复并增强血流动力学稳定性仍存在争议。
纳入50例年龄在18 - 70岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I - III级且Child-Pugh分级为A或B级、拟行择期腹腔镜肝部分切除术的患者。参与者被随机分为瑞马唑仑联合丙泊酚组(RP组)或丙泊酚组(P组)。两组均静脉注射舒芬太尼和顺式阿曲库铵进行诱导,随后分别给予瑞马唑仑 - 丙泊酚联合氟马西尼拮抗或单纯丙泊酚。记录苏醒参数,包括能听从指令的时间、脑电双频指数(BIS)大于80的时间以及拔除气管导管的时间。记录在预定时间间隔的镇静 - 躁动评分(SAS)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)、血流动力学指标及不良事件。
RP组能听从指令的时间、BIS大于80的时间和拔除气管导管的时间均显著短于P组。术后麻醉恢复室(PACU)30分钟后的SAS评分显著高于P组,但PACU 15分钟和30分钟后的VAS评分显著低于P组。P组T1时的平均动脉压(MAP)显著低于RP组。此外,RP组诱导后低血压发生率降低,无需术后补救镇痛,且未出现苏醒期躁动。
与单纯丙泊酚相比,瑞马唑仑 - 丙泊酚联合氟马西尼拮抗能使腹腔镜肝部分切除术患者恢复更快、更完全,围手术期血流动力学稳定性更佳,镇痛需求减少。