Pepe Francesco, Russo Gianluca, Venetis Konstantinos, Scimone Claudia, Palumbo Lucia, Nacchio Mariantonia, di Giovanni Domenica, Sarracino Claudia, Tomaiuolo Ilaria, Zulato Elisabetta, Fassan Matteo, Righi Daniela, Perrone Giuseppe, de Biase Dario, Casati Gabriele, Pagni Fabio, Gullotti Lucia, Rizzo Antonio, Perez Alessandro, Russo Antonio, Zavaglia Katia, Gragnano Gianluca, Cozzolino Domenico, Alfano Sabrina, Scatena Cristian, D'andrea Sara, Schiappacassi Monica, Roscigno Giuseppina, Paganotti Alessia, Boldorini Renzo, Esposito Francesco, Pallante Pierlorenzo, Furlan Daniela, Sbaraglia Marta, Dei Tos Angelo Paolo, Troncone Giancarlo, Fusco Nicola, Malapelle Umberto
Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
J Liq Biopsy. 2025 Jul 28;9:100314. doi: 10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100314. eCollection 2025 Sep.
To date, activating mutations acts as key player to clinically stratify estrogen receptor (ER)+/HER2-advanced breast cancer (BC) patients eligible to novel new generation oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degraders (SERD) relapsing after first line aromatase inhibitors. Liquid biopsy represents the most useful biological source to detect activating mutations in clinical setting, but the lack of standardized pre-analytical and analytical procedures drastically impacts on detection rate of mutations in diagnostic specimens. Here, we sought to harmonize technical procedures comparing technical performance of diagnostically available testing strategies on a series of three reference specimens (sample A, B, C) harboring p.D538G mutation at different mutant allele fraction (MAF) (5.0 %, 1.0 %, 0.5 %) shared with n = 10 Italian referral institutions.
A total of 10 μl of gDNA from each reference sample built to mimic clinically detectable molecular alteration (5.0 %, 1.0 %, 0.5 % VAF) was shipped by coordinator institution to each participating group to test p.D538G alteration leveraging own routinely available testing strategy. Artificial reference sample was previously validated by the University of Naples Federico II before arranging the shipment.
exon 10 p.(D538G) hotspot mutation was successfully identified in 90.0 % of samples A, B whereas 8 out of 10 (80.0 %) participating institutions detected sample referenced alteration in sample C. No statistically significant variations were observed between dPCR and NGS based workflows in terms of detectability rate on standard reference samples. A single participating institution (ID#5) failed to detect p.(D538G) alteration but supervised procedures by coordinator institution enabled to detect referenced mutation in engineered reference samples set adopting an orthogonal technology (dPCR). In addition, NGS and dPCR platforms displayed a similar technical performance in detecting across samples A-C.
NGS and dPCR systems may be considered valid technical solutions to target low frequency alterations in diagnostic routine samples. Harmonized ring trials are key weapons to standardize analytical and post-analytical procedures optimizing clinical stratification of BC patients.
迄今为止,激活突变是对一线芳香化酶抑制剂治疗后复发的、适合新一代口服选择性雌激素受体降解剂(SERD)的雌激素受体(ER)阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性晚期乳腺癌(BC)患者进行临床分层的关键因素。液体活检是在临床环境中检测激活突变最有用的生物学来源,但缺乏标准化的分析前和分析程序严重影响了诊断标本中突变的检测率。在此,我们试图通过比较一系列三个参考标本(样本A、B、C)中不同突变等位基因频率(MAF)(5.0%、1.0%、0.5%)的p.D538G突变的诊断可用检测策略的技术性能,来统一技术程序,这三个参考标本与n = 10家意大利转诊机构共享。
由协调机构将为模拟临床可检测分子改变(5.0%、1.0%、0.5% VAF)构建的每个参考样本的10 μl基因组DNA(gDNA)运送给每个参与组,以利用其常规可用的检测策略检测p.D538G改变。人工参考样本在安排运送之前已由那不勒斯费德里科二世大学验证。
在90.0%的样本A、B中成功鉴定出第10外显子p.(D538G)热点突变,而10个参与机构中有8个(80.0%)在样本C中检测到参考改变。基于数字PCR(dPCR)和二代测序(NGS)的工作流程在标准参考样本的可检测率方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。一个参与机构(ID#5)未能检测到p.(D538G)改变,但协调机构的监督程序使得能够在采用正交技术(dPCR)的工程参考样本集中检测到参考突变。此外,NGS和dPCR平台在检测样本A - C时表现出相似的技术性能。
NGS和dPCR系统可被视为在诊断常规样本中靶向低频改变的有效技术解决方案。统一的环式试验是标准化分析和分析后程序、优化BC患者临床分层的关键手段。