Kato Takeshi, Miyakoshi Junichi, Owa Misa, Mine Ryuji
Hitachi Kyoto University Laboratory, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Digital Innovation R&D, Research & Development Group, Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 12;20(8):e0330174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330174. eCollection 2025.
Reducing wealth inequality is a global challenge, and the problems of capitalism stem from the enclosure of the commons and the breakdown of the community. According to previous studies by Polanyi, Karatani, and Graeber, economic modes can be divided into capitalist market economy (enclosure and exchange), power economy (de-enclosure and redistribution), gift economy (obligation to return and reciprocity), and concession economy (de-obligation to return). The concession economy reflects Graeber's baseline communism (from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs) and Deguchi's We-turn philosophy (the "I" as an individual has a "fundamental incapability" and the subject of physical action, responsibility, and freedom is "We" as a multi-agent system, including the "I"). In this study, we constructed novel network models for these four modes and compared their properties (cluster coefficient, graph density, reciprocity, assortativity, centrality, and Gini coefficient). Our calculation results show that the market economy has more inequality; the power economy mitigates inequality but cannot eliminate it; the gift and concession economies lead to a more healthy and equal economy; and the concession economy, free from the constraints of obligation to return, is possible without guaranteeing reciprocity. In comparison with the established models, we found that the power economy is equivalent to Barabási-Albert model with power law, that the gift and concession economies can be positioned within variations of Watts-Strogatz model with small-world property, and that the approach from concession to gift economies is more effective in reducing inequality, fostering natural reciprocity while avoiding the constraints of return. We intend to promote the transformation from a capitalist economy to a concession economy through activities that disseminate baseline communism and the We-turn philosophy that promotes concession, that is, developing a cooperative platform to support concession through information technology and empirical research through fieldwork.
减少财富不平等是一项全球性挑战,资本主义的问题源于公地的圈占和社区的瓦解。根据波兰尼、柄谷行人以及大卫·格雷伯之前的研究,经济模式可分为资本主义市场经济(圈占与交换)、权力经济(去圈占与再分配)、礼物经济(回报义务与互惠)以及让步经济(去回报义务)。让步经济体现了格雷伯的基准共产主义(各尽所能,按需分配)以及手冢祥孝的“我们转向”哲学(作为个体的“我”具有“根本无能力”,而身体行动、责任和自由的主体是作为多主体系统的“我们”,包括“我”)。在本研究中,我们为这四种模式构建了新颖的网络模型,并比较了它们的属性(聚类系数、图密度、互惠性、 assortativity、中心性和基尼系数)。我们的计算结果表明,市场经济存在更多不平等;权力经济减轻了不平等但无法消除它;礼物经济和让步经济导致更健康和平等的经济;并且让步经济不受回报义务的约束,在不保证互惠的情况下也是可能的。与已有的模型相比,我们发现权力经济等同于具有幂律的巴拉巴西 - 阿尔伯特模型,礼物经济和让步经济可以定位在具有小世界属性的瓦茨 - 斯托加茨模型的变体范围内,并且从让步经济到礼物经济的转变在减少不平等、促进自然互惠同时避免回报约束方面更有效。我们打算通过传播基准共产主义和促进让步的“我们转向”哲学的活动,推动从资本主义经济向让步经济的转变,即通过信息技术开发一个支持让步的合作平台,并通过实地调查进行实证研究。