Kato Takeshi
Kyoto University Laboratory, Open Innovation Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;25(2):224. doi: 10.3390/e25020224.
Given wealth inequality worldwide, there is an urgent need to identify the mode of wealth exchange through which it arises. To address the research gap regarding models that combine equivalent exchange and redistribution, this study compares an equivalent market exchange with redistribution based on power centers and a non-equivalent exchange with mutual aid using the Polanyi, Graeber, and Karatani modes of exchange. Two new exchange models based on multi-agent interactions are reconstructed following an econophysics-based approach for evaluating the Gini index (inequality) and total exchange (economic flow). Exchange simulations indicate that the evaluation parameter of the total exchange divided by the Gini index can be expressed by the same saturated curvilinear approximate equation using the wealth transfer rate and time period of redistribution, the surplus contribution rate of the wealthy, and the saving rate. However, considering the coercion of taxes and its associated costs and independence based on the morality of mutual aid, a non-equivalent exchange without return obligation is preferred. This is oriented toward Graeber's baseline communism and Karatani's mode of exchange D, with implications for alternatives to the capitalist economy.
鉴于全球财富不平等现象,迫切需要确定财富不平等产生的财富交换模式。为了填补关于结合等价交换和再分配的模型的研究空白,本研究使用波兰尼、格拉伯和柄谷行人的交换模式,将等价市场交换与基于权力中心的再分配以及与互助的非等价交换进行了比较。遵循基于经济物理学的方法来评估基尼指数(不平等)和总交换(经济流动),重建了两种基于多主体相互作用的新交换模型。交换模拟表明,总交换的评估参数除以基尼指数,可以用相同的饱和曲线近似方程来表示,该方程使用财富转移率和再分配时间段、富人的剩余贡献率以及储蓄率。然而,考虑到税收的强制性及其相关成本以及基于互助道德的独立性,无回报义务的非等价交换更为可取。这以格拉伯的基准共产主义和柄谷行人的交换模式D为导向,对资本主义经济的替代方案具有启示意义。