Lotfipour Shahram, Olliffe Ian, Hayden Stephen, Saadat Soheil, Langdorf Mark I
University of California, Irvine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Irvine, California.
Eisenhower Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rancho Mirage, California.
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 24;26(4):763-766. doi: 10.5811/westjem.48551.
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME) proposal to mandate 48-month training for all emergency medicine residency programs represents a significant departure from the current system where both 36- and 48-month formats successfully coexist.The ACGME's justification relies on a methodologically flawed survey that never directly asked program directors about optimal training duration. Instead, it calculated totals by summing individual rotation estimates without considering integrated curricula or practical constraints. Even if these results were to be accepted, directors of three-year programs reported a mean desired duration of only 41.6 months-hardly justifying a universal 48-month mandate.Current evidence contradicts the ACGME's rationale. Three-year graduates achieve higher board pass rates (93.1% vs 90.8%) and demonstrate equivalent clinical performance to four-year graduates. The mandate would impose substantial financial burdens on trainees-an opportunity cost exceeding $200,000-$250,000-while potentially deterring qualified applicants and discouraging fellowship training.We urge the ACGME to pause implementation and provide compelling evidence that a 48-month mandate is necessary and demonstrably superior to the current model.
研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)提议强制要求所有急诊医学住院医师培训项目进行为期48个月的培训,这与目前36个月和48个月培训模式成功并存的体系有很大不同。ACGME的理由基于一项方法存在缺陷的调查,该调查从未直接询问项目主任关于最佳培训时长的问题。相反,它通过将各个轮转估计值相加来计算总数,而没有考虑综合课程或实际限制。即使这些结果被接受,三年制项目的主任报告的平均期望时长仅为41.6个月,很难为普遍的48个月强制要求提供正当理由。目前的证据与ACGME的理由相矛盾。三年制毕业生的委员会通过率更高(93.1%对90.8%),并且表现出与四年制毕业生相当的临床能力。这项强制要求将给受训人员带来巨大的经济负担——机会成本超过20万至25万美元——同时可能会阻碍合格申请人并不利于专科培训。我们敦促ACGME暂停实施,并提供令人信服的证据,证明48个月的强制要求是必要的,并且明显优于当前模式。