Beeson Michael S, Barton Melissa A, Reisdorff Earl J, Carter Wallace A, Gausche-Hill Marianne, Gorgas Diane L, Joldersma Kevin B, Santen Sally A
Department of Emergency Medicine Summa Health Akron Ohio USA.
American Board of Emergency Medicine East Lansing Michigan USA.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Jun 10;4(3):e12991. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12991. eCollection 2023 Jun.
This study compares performance data from physicians completing 3-year versus 4-year emergency medicine residency training programs. Currently, there are 2 training formats and little is known about objective performance differences.
This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of emergency residents and physicians. Multiple analyses were conducted comparing physicians' performances, including Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education Milestones and American Board of Emergency Medicine In-training Examination (ITE), Qualifying Examination (QE), Oral Certification Examination (OCE), and program extensions from 3-year and 4-year residency programs. Some confounding variables were not or could not be considered, such as rationale for medical students to choose one format over another, as well as application and final match rates.
Milestone scores are higher for emergency medicine 3 residents in 1-3 programs (3.51) versus emergency medicine 3 residents in 1-4 programs (3.07; < 0.001, = 1.47) and highest for emergency medicine 4 residents (3.67). There was no significant difference in program extension rates (emergency medicine 1-3, 8.1%; emergency medicine 1-4, 9.6%; = 0.05, = 0.02). ITE scores were higher for emergency medicine 1, 2, and 3 residents from 1-3 programs and emergency medicine 4 residents from 1-4 programs scored highest. Mean QE score was slightly higher for emergency 1-3 physicians (83.55 vs 83.00; < 0.01, = 0.10). QE pass rate was higher for emergency 1-3 physicians (93.1% vs 90.8%; < 0.001, = 0.08). Mean OCE score was slightly higher for emergency 1-4 physicians (5.67 vs 5.65; = 0.03 = -0.07) but did not reach a priori statistical significance (α < 0.01). OCE pass rate was also slightly higher for emergency 1-4 physicians (96.9% vs 95.5%; = 0.06, = -0.07) but also non-significant.
These results suggest that although performance measures demonstrate small differences between physicians from emergency medicine 1-3 and 1-4 programs, these differences are limited in their ability to make causal claims about performance on the basis of program format alone.
本研究比较了完成3年制与4年制急诊医学住院医师培训项目的医生的绩效数据。目前,有两种培训形式,而关于客观绩效差异知之甚少。
这是一项针对急诊住院医师和医生的回顾性横断面分析。进行了多项分析以比较医生的表现,包括研究生医学教育认证委员会的里程碑指标以及美国急诊医学委员会的住院医师培训考试(ITE)、资格考试(QE)、口试认证考试(OCE),以及3年制和4年制住院医师项目的延期情况。一些混杂变量未被考虑或无法考虑,例如医学生选择一种形式而非另一种形式的理由,以及申请率和最终匹配率。
在1 - 3个项目中的急诊医学3年制住院医师的里程碑得分(3.51)高于1 - 4个项目中的急诊医学3年制住院医师(3.07;<0.001,=1.47),而急诊医学4年制住院医师的得分最高(3.67)。项目延期率没有显著差异(急诊医学1 - 3年制,8.1%;急诊医学1 - 4年制,9.6%;=0.05,=0.02)。1 - 3个项目中的急诊医学1、2和3年制住院医师的ITE得分较高,1 - 4个项目中的急诊医学4年制住院医师得分最高。急诊1 - 3年制医生的QE平均得分略高(83.55对83.00;<0.01,=0.10)。急诊1 - 3年制医生的QE通过率较高(93.1%对90.8%;<0.001,=0.08)。急诊1 - 4年制医生的OCE平均得分略高(5.67对5.65;=0.03 = -0.07),但未达到先验统计学显著性(α<0.01)。急诊1 - 4年制医生的OCE通过率也略高(96.9%对95.5%;=0.06,= -0.07),但也不显著。
这些结果表明,尽管绩效指标显示急诊医学1 - 3年制和1 - 4年制项目的医生之间存在细微差异,但仅凭项目形式就这些差异对绩效进行因果推断的能力有限。