Vitale Roxana G, de Hoog Sybren, Stock Frida, Scudder Chelsea, Shahegh Sherin E, Aneke Chioma I, Tolooe Ali, Fennelly Kevin P, Lionakis Michail S, Kwon-Chung June, Seyedmousavi Amir
National Council for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Unidad de Parasitología, Sector Micología, Hospital JM Ramos Mejia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Med Mycol. 2025 Aug 5;63(8). doi: 10.1093/mmy/myaf072.
Melanized fungi have occasionally been identified as causative agents of severe phaeohyphomycoses, chromoblastomycosis, and mycetoma. In a retrospective study conducted from January 2012 to December 2022, a total of 133 melanized fungi were isolated from hospitalized patients at the NIH Clinical Center, both with and without known underlying predisposing factors. Isolate identification was based on phenotypic characteristics, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS), and PCR sequencing of the rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. Members of the black yeast order Chaetothyriales were the most prevalent (40, 30%), predominantly Exophiala dermatitidis (30/40, 75%). Other major groups included: Capnodiales (30, 22.6%), Pleosporales (24, 18%), Mycosphaerellales (19, 14.3%), Calosphaeriales (8, 6%), and Venturiales (7, 5.3%). MALDI-ToF often failed to accurately identify the isolates, except for E. dermatitidis, which yielded scores ≥2. ITS sequencing was effective in accurately identifying the melanized fungi encountered in clinical settings. Antifungal susceptibility testing against eight antifungal agents showed that azoles, micafungin, and terbinafine exhibited in vitro activity against most isolates. In contrast, olorofim and amphotericin B were less effective. Notably, Phaeoacremonium species (Calosphaeriales) exhibited distinct antifungal susceptibility patterns. Accurate identification of melanized fungi in clinical laboratories is essential for selecting effective antifungal therapy, understanding susceptibility patterns to available agents, supporting epidemiological monitoring, and ultimately enhancing clinical outcomes in patients affected by these often complex and opportunistic infections.
黑化真菌偶尔被确认为严重暗色丝孢霉病、着色芽生菌病和足菌肿的病原体。在一项于2012年1月至2022年12月进行的回顾性研究中,从美国国立卫生研究院临床中心的住院患者中总共分离出133株黑化真菌,这些患者既有已知的潜在易感因素,也有无此类因素的。菌株鉴定基于表型特征、基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-ToF MS)以及核糖体DNA内转录间隔区(ITS)区域的PCR测序。暗酵母目毛壳目成员最为常见(40株,占30%),主要是皮炎外瓶霉(30/40,占75%)。其他主要类群包括:小煤炱目(30株,占22.6%)、格孢腔菌目(24株,占18%)、球腔菌目(19株,占14.3%)、球壳孢目(8株,占6%)和黑星菌目(7株,占5.3%)。除皮炎外瓶霉产生的分数≥2外,MALDI-ToF常常无法准确鉴定分离菌株。ITS测序对于准确鉴定临床环境中遇到的黑化真菌很有效。针对八种抗真菌药物的药敏试验表明,唑类、米卡芬净和特比萘芬对大多数分离菌株表现出体外活性。相比之下,奥洛罗芬和两性霉素B效果较差。值得注意的是,拟顶孢属物种(球壳孢目)表现出独特的药敏模式。在临床实验室中准确鉴定黑化真菌对于选择有效的抗真菌治疗、了解对现有药物的药敏模式、支持流行病学监测以及最终改善受这些往往复杂的机会性感染影响患者的临床结局至关重要。