Tay Yi Xiang, Wee Jeremy C P, Ong Marcus E H, Foley Shane J, Chen Robert Chun, Chan Lai Peng, Killeen Ronan, Tan Eu Jin, Mak May San, Ng Glenn Y H, Foo Yang Yann, McNulty Jonathan P
Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Radiography Department, Allied Health Division, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf035.
Assessment of context and readiness to change are key components in the implementation of imaging referral guidelines.
In line with JBI's (formerly known as the Joanna Briggs Institute) approach to evidence implementation, the aim of this study was to apply a mixed-methods study design to assess the context and readiness of physicians to use evidence-based imaging and referral guidelines, in tandem with associated opportunities and barriers.
A survey was administered to physicians in an emergency department (ED) in Singapore, followed by virtual focus group sessions with physicians who volunteered. Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate differences in specialist and non-specialist responses. Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis was followed for data engagement, coding, and theme development.
Fourteen physicians responded to the survey, and 16 physicians participated in the focus groups. All physicians agreed that imaging utilization will increase in the coming decade, and most agree that overuse is a problem in the ED, especially conventional radiography (CR). Physicians gave a median score of 4 out of 5 to most questions evaluating their knowledge, skills, and attitude. There was no statistical difference in the scores between non-specialists and specialists, except for their preference for imaging guidelines that provide evidence to enhance clinical judgement (P = .03), where specialists had a higher mean rank. Key themes generated were workplace culture and factors influencing imaging referrals.
Imaging overutilization in the ED, especially CR, is a problem. While physicians have the readiness, awareness, knowledge, skills, and attitude to change practice, factors such as workplace culture, medico-legal landscape, and interdisciplinary relationships impede such changes. The development of institutional guidelines coupled with targeted strategies and efforts involving key stakeholders is necessary to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap.
对背景情况和变革准备程度的评估是实施影像转诊指南的关键要素。
根据循证医学中心(前身为乔安娜·布里格斯循证医学中心)的证据实施方法,本研究旨在采用混合方法研究设计,评估医生运用循证影像和转诊指南的背景情况与准备程度,以及相关的机遇和障碍。
对新加坡一家急诊科的医生进行了一项调查,随后与自愿参与的医生进行了虚拟焦点小组讨论。采用曼-惠特尼U检验来评估专科医生和非专科医生回答的差异。遵循布劳恩和克拉克的反思性主题分析法进行数据处理、编码和主题开发。
14名医生回复了调查问卷,16名医生参与了焦点小组讨论。所有医生都认为未来十年影像检查的使用将会增加,并且大多数人认同过度使用是急诊科存在的一个问题,尤其是传统放射成像(CR)。在评估医生的知识、技能和态度的大多数问题上,医生给出的中位数分数为4分(满分5分)。非专科医生和专科医生的分数没有统计学差异,但在对能提供增强临床判断证据的影像指南的偏好方面除外(P = 0.03),专科医生的平均排名更高。产生的关键主题包括工作场所文化和影响影像转诊的因素。
急诊科的影像过度使用,尤其是CR,是一个问题。虽然医生有改变实践的意愿、意识、知识、技能和态度,但工作场所文化、医疗法律环境和跨学科关系等因素阻碍了这种改变。制定机构指南并结合涉及关键利益相关者的针对性策略和努力对于弥合证据与实践之间的差距是必要的。