Soldatic Karen, Lee Mikyung, Tunggal Eunice, Liao Ashley, Magee Liam
Canada Excellence Research Chair-Health Equity and Community Wellbeing, School of Disability Studies, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Institute of Culture and Society, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Front Sociol. 2025 Jul 21;10:1593330. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1593330. eCollection 2025.
Everyday consumer technologies are increasingly integral to autonomy, mobility, and social participation among people with disabilities and migrants from culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) backgrounds. However, these technologies often remain inaccessible and exclusionary at the intersection of these identities. This study examined how CaLD migrants with disabilities engage with everyday consumer technologies using participatory and intersectionality-informed approaches. This article focuses on Stage Two of the Autonomy, Diversity & Disability: Everyday Practices of Technology project, funded by the Australian Research Council industry partnership grant (LP: 190900099), which involved individual interviews, creative workshops, guided discussions, post-workshop reflections, and the co-creation of AI-generated e-books. Drawing on three case studies, the analysis identified three key findings: (1) participants experienced a disproportionate burden in navigating digital accessibility and advocating for their needs; (2) generative AI perpetuated biases and misrepresentations of intersecting identities; and (3) participants actively used everyday consumer technologies to foster agency, learning, caregiving, and cultural connection. Through sustained participatory engagement, the researchers identified methodological parameters to inform future disability-inclusive, participatory, and intersectionality-informed research.
日常消费技术对于残疾人和来自文化和语言背景多元(CaLD)的移民的自主性、行动能力和社会参与日益不可或缺。然而,在这些身份的交叉点上,这些技术往往仍然无法使用且具有排他性。本研究采用参与式和基于交叉性的方法,考察了残疾的CaLD移民如何与日常消费技术互动。本文聚焦于由澳大利亚研究理事会行业合作基金(LP:190900099)资助的“自主性、多样性与残疾:技术的日常实践”项目的第二阶段,该阶段包括个人访谈、创意工作坊、引导式讨论、工作坊后的反思以及人工智能生成电子书的共同创作。通过三个案例研究,分析得出三个关键发现:(1)参与者在应对数字无障碍问题和倡导自身需求时负担过重;(2)生成式人工智能延续了交叉身份的偏见和错误描述;(3)参与者积极利用日常消费技术来促进能动性、学习、照料和文化联系。通过持续的参与式介入,研究人员确定了方法参数,为未来具有残疾包容性、参与式和基于交叉性的研究提供参考。