Chu Natalie, Bye Rosalind, Lim David
School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Centre for Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Aug;72(4):e70038. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70038.
People from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds constitute a significant portion of Australia's population but have disproportionately lower access to disability services compared to people from non-CALD backgrounds. While their service needs have been well documented, research on the impact of disability policy has not. This study explored the experiences of service providers who support people from CALD backgrounds living with physical disability in New South Wales (NSW) to understand their experiences of delivering disability services to this client group and how these experiences are influenced by Australian disability policy.
Three instances of consumer feedback influenced revisions to interview questions and study design. Two were within a university context, and one was with a community group that focusses on people from CALD backgrounds living with disability.
Recruitment of disability service providers was undertaken using a broad approach, via contact with numerous disability service provider organisations in NSW. Overall, seven service providers were recruited, which included three disability support workers, three occupational therapists, and a nurse. Participants engaged in a semi-structured interview over video conference. Their accounts were transcribed and analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis.
Four groups of experiential themes arose from the analysis. More time is required when working with people from CALD backgrounds; Person centred care can be facilitated by policy, community engagement, and expertise; a fragmented sector superimposed on intersectionality; and integrated care is facilitated by community engagement, networks, and relationship building.
This research identified key themes that reflected service providers experiences. It illustrates how Australian disability policy shapes service provision for this cohort, and how policy improvements have the capacity to enhance service provision.
People from CALD backgrounds make up a large part of Australia's population but use disability services less often. There is little research on how disability policy affects them. This study looked at service providers in NSW who help people from CALD backgrounds with physical disabilities to understand their experiences and the role of disability policy. The study found four key points. Service providers feel they need more time to work with people from CALD backgrounds and that government policies can have an impact on this. Another was that service providers' cultural skills and knowledge are helpful and that disability policy which allows people to choose their providers helps this. Another was that the disability sector was disorganised and that people who experience many forms of disadvantage find this even more difficult. The last culturally sensitive support from family, friends, and the community is important, for which some parts of disability policy encourage this more than others. Further research is still needed to find policy solutions for these issues.
来自文化和语言多元(CALD)背景的人群占澳大利亚人口的很大一部分,但与非CALD背景的人相比,他们获得残疾服务的机会要少得多。虽然他们的服务需求已有详细记录,但关于残疾政策影响的研究却没有。本研究探讨了在新南威尔士州(NSW)为有身体残疾的CALD背景人群提供支持的服务提供者的经历,以了解他们为该客户群体提供残疾服务的经历,以及这些经历如何受到澳大利亚残疾政策的影响。
消费者反馈的三个实例影响了访谈问题和研究设计的修订。两个实例来自大学环境,一个来自一个关注有残疾的CALD背景人群的社区团体。
通过与新南威尔士州众多残疾服务提供者组织联系,采用广泛的方法招募残疾服务提供者。总体而言,招募了七名服务提供者,其中包括三名残疾支持工作者、三名职业治疗师和一名护士。参与者通过视频会议进行了半结构化访谈。他们的叙述被转录并使用解释现象学分析进行分析。
分析产生了四组经验主题。与CALD背景的人合作时需要更多时间;政策、社区参与和专业知识可以促进以人为本的护理;一个分散的部门叠加在交叉性之上;社区参与、网络和关系建立有助于提供综合护理。
本研究确定了反映服务提供者经历的关键主题。它说明了澳大利亚残疾政策如何塑造为这一群体提供的服务,以及政策改进如何有能力加强服务提供。
来自CALD背景的人占澳大利亚人口的很大一部分,但较少使用残疾服务。关于残疾政策如何影响他们的研究很少。本研究考察了新南威尔士州帮助有身体残疾的CALD背景人群的服务提供者,以了解他们的经历以及残疾政策的作用。该研究发现了四个关键点。服务提供者认为他们需要更多时间与CALD背景的人合作,并且政府政策可以对此产生影响。另一个是服务提供者的文化技能和知识很有帮助,允许人们选择提供者的残疾政策有助于此。另一个是残疾部门杂乱无章,经历多种不利因素的人发现这更加困难。最后,来自家人、朋友和社区的文化敏感支持很重要,残疾政策的某些部分比其他部分更鼓励这种支持。仍需要进一步研究以找到解决这些问题的政策方案。