Armstrong Daniel P, Deluzio Kevin J, Scott Stephen H
Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
iScience. 2025 Jul 16;28(8):113122. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113122. eCollection 2025 Aug 15.
Muscular co-contraction (simultaneous activation of both agonist and antagonist muscle groups) has been observed to emerge across a range of challenging tasks. But is it beneficial? In this study we address this untested assumption by quantifying the performance benefits of muscular co-contraction when making rapid corrective responses to mechanical perturbations. Even small levels of co-contraction resulted in significant performance improvements compared to the relaxed condition in a target recapture task following a mechanical perturbation. Performance was also better when co-contracting compared to when a single muscle group was active prior to the perturbation. The performance benefits of co-contracting seem partially attributable to neural mechanisms where activation of both agonist and antagonist muscles allowed both groups to contribute to limb control via reflex responses. These findings highlight how co-contraction can greatly impact motor performance. Further, the benefit of co-contraction extends beyond just increased muscle activity providing instantaneous resistance to limb motion.
肌肉协同收缩(即同时激活主动肌和拮抗肌群)已被观察到在一系列具有挑战性的任务中出现。但它有益吗?在本研究中,我们通过量化在对机械扰动做出快速纠正反应时肌肉协同收缩的性能益处,来解决这一未经检验的假设。在机械扰动后的目标重新捕获任务中,与放松状态相比,即使是小程度的协同收缩也会带来显著的性能提升。与在扰动前仅单个肌群活跃时相比,协同收缩时的表现也更好。协同收缩的性能益处似乎部分归因于神经机制,即主动肌和拮抗肌的激活使两组肌肉都能通过反射反应对肢体控制做出贡献。这些发现突出了协同收缩如何能极大地影响运动表现。此外,协同收缩的益处不仅限于增加肌肉活动从而为肢体运动提供即时阻力。