McCone Harvey, Butler John S, O'Connell Redmond G
School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Aug 29;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00279. eCollection 2024.
Accurate timing is essential for coordinating our actions in everyday tasks such as playing music and sport. Although an extensive body of research has examined the human electrophysiological signatures underpinning timing, the specific dynamics of these signals remain unclear. Here, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) while participants performed a variant of a time interval reproduction task that has previously been administered to macaques, and examined how task performance was predicted by the dynamics of three well-known EEG signals: limb-selective motor preparation in the mu/beta band (8-30 Hz), the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV), and the Centro-Parietal Positivity (CPP) evidence accumulation signal. In close correspondence with single unit recordings in macaques, contralateral mu/beta signals indicated that participants reproduced intervals by adjusting the starting level and build-up rate of motor preparation to reach a response triggering threshold at the desired time. The CNV showed a highly similar pattern with the exception that its pre-response amplitude was increased for faster reproductions. This pattern of results suggests that, rather than tracing a veridical temporal accumulator as had been suggested in earlier work, the CNV more closely resembles a dynamic anticipatory signal. In contrast, the CPP did not exhibit any relationship with reproduction time, suggesting that the evidence accumulation processes guiding perceptual decisions are not involved in generating representations of elapsed time. Our findings highlight close similarities in the dynamics exhibited by intracranial and non-invasive motor preparation signals during interval reproduction while indicating that the CNV traces a functionally distinct process whose precise role remains to be understood.
准确计时对于协调我们在日常任务(如演奏音乐和运动)中的行动至关重要。尽管大量研究已经考察了支撑计时的人类电生理特征,但这些信号的具体动态仍不清楚。在这里,我们在参与者执行一种时间间隔再现任务的变体时记录了脑电图(EEG),该任务先前已应用于猕猴,并研究了任务表现如何由三种著名的EEG信号的动态来预测:μ/β频段(8 - 30赫兹)中的肢体选择性运动准备、关联性负变(CNV)以及中央顶叶正波(CPP)证据积累信号。与猕猴的单细胞记录密切对应,对侧μ/β信号表明参与者通过调整运动准备的起始水平和积累速率来再现时间间隔,以便在期望的时间达到响应触发阈值。CNV显示出高度相似的模式,只是其反应前振幅在更快的再现中增加。这种结果模式表明,与早期工作中所提出的追踪真实的时间累加器不同,CNV更类似于一个动态的预期信号。相比之下,CPP与再现时间没有任何关系,这表明指导感知决策的证据积累过程不参与生成经过时间的表征。我们的研究结果突出了颅内和非侵入性运动准备信号在时间间隔再现过程中所表现出的动态的密切相似性,同时表明CNV追踪的是一个功能上不同的过程,其确切作用仍有待理解。