• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙泊酚与吸入性麻醉剂用于神经外科手术中脑松弛的比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Comparison of propofol and inhalational anaesthetics for brain relaxation in neurosurgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Intarakhao Patcharin, Thiarawat Peeraphong, Dhippayom Teerapon

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Aug;69(8):770-778. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_189_25. Epub 2025 Jul 10.

DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_189_25
PMID:40800708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12338466/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The impact of anaesthetic agents on brain relaxation during neurosurgical procedures remains debatable. This study aimed to compare propofol and volatile anaesthetics during maintenance anaesthesia in achieving optimal brain relaxation in adults undergoing intracranial surgery.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and EBSCO Open Dissertations databases from inception to February 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anaesthetic agents in patients over 18 years old undergoing neurosurgical procedures were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects who achieved satisfactory brain relaxation, as indicated by a score of 1 on the 4-point Brain Relaxation Score (BRS). The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of included studies. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. The effects on brain relaxation were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA). We also evaluated the certainty of evidence using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) online platform.

RESULTS

Out of 2,264 articles identified, 11 RCTs involving 1,367 participants were included. The chance of having satisfactory brain relaxation of the following anaesthetics appeared to be lower than propofol: sevoflurane (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.09), isoflurane (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.60, 1.34), and desflurane (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.65, 1.07), with moderate certainty of evidence. Propofol had the highest SUCRA ranking (81.4%).

CONCLUSION

Although all anaesthetic agents had similar effects, propofol showed a tendency towards better brain relaxation during neurosurgery. Further robust evidence is required to confirm the potential advantages of propofol.

摘要

背景与目的

麻醉药物对神经外科手术期间脑松弛的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较丙泊酚和挥发性麻醉药在维持麻醉期间对接受颅内手术的成年人实现最佳脑松弛的效果。

方法

我们检索了从数据库建立至2024年2月的PubMed、Embase、Cochrane和EBSCO开放学位论文数据库。纳入比较18岁以上接受神经外科手术患者使用不同麻醉药物的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是在4分制脑松弛评分(BRS)中得分为1分,即达到满意脑松弛的受试者比例。采用修订的Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的质量。使用随机效应模型计算风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)对脑松弛效果进行排序。我们还使用网络Meta分析可信度(CINeMA)在线平台评估证据的确定性。

结果

在识别出的数据中,2264篇文章中,11项RCT共纳入1367名参与者。以下麻醉药实现满意脑松弛的可能性似乎低于丙泊酚:七氟烷(RR:0.93;95%CI:0.79,1.09)、异氟烷(RR:0.89;95%CI:0.60,1.34)和地氟烷(RR:0.83;95%CI:0.65,1.07),证据确定性为中等。丙泊酚的SUCRA排名最高(81.4%)。

结论

尽管所有麻醉药物的效果相似,但丙泊酚在神经外科手术期间显示出更好的脑松弛趋势。需要进一步有力的证据来证实丙泊酚的潜在优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8639/12338466/38194fc4c401/IJA-69-770-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8639/12338466/6f0a09ed9a5b/IJA-69-770-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8639/12338466/041aaf760056/IJA-69-770-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8639/12338466/cdc2728abec1/IJA-69-770-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8639/12338466/38194fc4c401/IJA-69-770-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8639/12338466/6f0a09ed9a5b/IJA-69-770-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8639/12338466/041aaf760056/IJA-69-770-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8639/12338466/cdc2728abec1/IJA-69-770-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8639/12338466/38194fc4c401/IJA-69-770-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of propofol and inhalational anaesthetics for brain relaxation in neurosurgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.丙泊酚与吸入性麻醉剂用于神经外科手术中脑松弛的比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Aug;69(8):770-778. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_189_25. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
2
Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术老年患者术后认知结局:静脉麻醉维持与吸入麻醉维持的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;8(8):CD012317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012317.pub2.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Effects of sevoflurane versus other general anaesthesia on emergence agitation in children.七氟醚与其他全身麻醉对儿童苏醒期躁动的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 12;2014(9):CD007084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007084.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Spectral entropy monitoring for adults and children undergoing general anaesthesia.全身麻醉下成人和儿童的频谱熵监测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 14;3(3):CD010135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010135.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 6;8(8):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub7.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of propofol-based anesthesia against risk of brain swelling during craniotomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.丙泊酚麻醉预防开颅术中脑水肿风险的疗效:一项随机对照研究的荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Feb;92:111306. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111306. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
2
CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta-analysis.CINeMA:用于半自动评估网络荟萃分析结果可信度的软件。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 11;16(1):e1080. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1080. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Neurosurgical Anesthesia: Optimizing Outcomes with Agent Selection.
神经外科麻醉:通过药物选择优化治疗效果。
Biomedicines. 2023 Jan 27;11(2):372. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11020372.
4
Brain relaxation using desflurane anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumors: a randomized controlled study.脑松弛使用地氟醚麻醉和全静脉麻醉在幕上肿瘤开颅手术患者:一项随机对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jan 10;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-01970-z.
5
Efficacy and safety of sevoflurane vs propofol in combination with remifentanil for anesthesia maintenance during craniotomy: A meta-analysis.七氟醚与丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼用于开颅手术麻醉维持的疗效和安全性:Meta 分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e28400. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028400.
6
Intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia trial for outcome following intracranial aneurysm surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study.颅内动脉瘤手术后静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉效果的试验:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Jun 21;12:300. doi: 10.25259/SNI_342_2021. eCollection 2021.
7
Control of Hemodynamic Responses and Perioperative Outcomes in Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Available Evidence.经蝶窦垂体手术中血流动力学反应和围手术期结局的控制:现有证据的定性系统评价。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2022 Oct 1;34(4):372-383. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000766. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9
Anesthetic management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a qualitative systematic review.未破裂颅内动脉瘤的麻醉管理:一项定性系统评价。
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Oct;44(5):2477-2492. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01441-w. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
10
Comparison of postoperative cognitive dysfunction with the use of propofol versus desflurane in patients undergoing surgery for clipping of aneurysm after subarachnoid hemorrhage.蛛网膜下腔出血后行动脉瘤夹闭术患者中丙泊酚与地氟醚的使用对术后认知功能障碍的影响比较
Surg Neurol Int. 2020 Jul 4;11:174. doi: 10.25259/SNI_70_2020. eCollection 2020.