Cartagena Caleb, Alshawsh Mohammed, Bui Minh Q, Gamage Dinusha, Thakor Rajvi P, Pitt James, Greaves Ronda F, Wall Meg, Saffery Richard, Amor David J, Godler David E
Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Epigenomics. 2025 Sep;17(13):851-863. doi: 10.1080/17501911.2025.2544530. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
This study compared methylation-specific quantitative melt analysis of FMR1 and SNRPN methylation (mDNA) using automated bisulfite conversion by the magnetic-bead-based IsoPure and column-based QIAcube HT systems.
Two bisulfite conversion methods were assessed on 3.2 mm punches from the same archival blood spots stored at room temperature for >10 years of individuals with FMR1 premutation ( = 20), fragile X syndrome (FXS, = 20), or chromosome 15 imprinting disorders ( = 50) and freshly made blood spots from 184 newborns from the general population. Performance criteria were: (i) diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for the conditions screened; (ii) reaction failure rate; (iii) variability in mDNA between groups.
Both methods showed 100% sensitivity and specificity for differentiating FXS and individual chromosome 15 imprinting disorders. IsoPure showed reaction failure rates of 0.365% for SNRPN and 0.74% for FMR1 compared to 19.34% and 2.56%, for QIAcube HT, respectively, with most failed reactions originating from archival blood spots. IsoPure showed lower variability in mDNA values in the neurotypical and condition-specific ranges.
The IsoPure system showed superior performance especially on archival samples, with broader applications for screening and diagnostic testing requiring high-throughput mDNA analyses on materials of limited quantity and quality.
本研究比较了使用基于磁珠的IsoPure自动亚硫酸氢盐转化系统和基于柱的QIAcube HT系统对FMR1和SNRPN甲基化(mDNA)进行甲基化特异性定量熔解分析的情况。
对来自FMR1前突变个体(n = 20)、脆性X综合征(FXS,n = 20)或15号染色体印记障碍个体(n = 50)在室温下储存超过10年的相同存档血斑的3.2毫米打孔样本,以及来自184名普通人群新生儿的新鲜血斑样本,评估了两种亚硫酸氢盐转化方法。性能标准为:(i)所筛查疾病的诊断敏感性和特异性;(ii)反应失败率;(iii)组间mDNA的变异性。
两种方法在区分FXS和个体15号染色体印记障碍方面均显示出100%的敏感性和特异性。与QIAcube HT分别为19.34%和2.56%相比,IsoPure对SNRPN的反应失败率为0.365%,对FMR1的反应失败率为0.74%,大多数失败反应源自存档血斑。IsoPure在神经典型和疾病特异性范围内的mDNA值变异性较低。
IsoPure系统表现出卓越性能,尤其是对存档样本,在需要对数量和质量有限的材料进行高通量mDNA分析的筛查和诊断测试中有更广泛的应用。