Suppr超能文献

使用IsoPure和QIAcube HT系统对基于甲基化的新生儿筛查进行高通量评估。

High-throughput assessment of and methylation-based newborn screening using IsoPure and QIAcube HT systems.

作者信息

Cartagena Caleb, Alshawsh Mohammed, Bui Minh Q, Gamage Dinusha, Thakor Rajvi P, Pitt James, Greaves Ronda F, Wall Meg, Saffery Richard, Amor David J, Godler David E

机构信息

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Epigenomics. 2025 Sep;17(13):851-863. doi: 10.1080/17501911.2025.2544530. Epub 2025 Aug 13.

Abstract

AIM

This study compared methylation-specific quantitative melt analysis of FMR1 and SNRPN methylation (mDNA) using automated bisulfite conversion by the magnetic-bead-based IsoPure and column-based QIAcube HT systems.

METHODS

Two bisulfite conversion methods were assessed on 3.2 mm punches from the same archival blood spots stored at room temperature for >10 years of individuals with FMR1 premutation ( = 20), fragile X syndrome (FXS,  = 20), or chromosome 15 imprinting disorders ( = 50) and freshly made blood spots from 184 newborns from the general population. Performance criteria were: (i) diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for the conditions screened; (ii) reaction failure rate; (iii) variability in mDNA between groups.

RESULTS

Both methods showed 100% sensitivity and specificity for differentiating FXS and individual chromosome 15 imprinting disorders. IsoPure showed reaction failure rates of 0.365% for SNRPN and 0.74% for FMR1 compared to 19.34% and 2.56%, for QIAcube HT, respectively, with most failed reactions originating from archival blood spots. IsoPure showed lower variability in mDNA values in the neurotypical and condition-specific ranges.

CONCLUSION

The IsoPure system showed superior performance especially on archival samples, with broader applications for screening and diagnostic testing requiring high-throughput mDNA analyses on materials of limited quantity and quality.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了使用基于磁珠的IsoPure自动亚硫酸氢盐转化系统和基于柱的QIAcube HT系统对FMR1和SNRPN甲基化(mDNA)进行甲基化特异性定量熔解分析的情况。

方法

对来自FMR1前突变个体(n = 20)、脆性X综合征(FXS,n = 20)或15号染色体印记障碍个体(n = 50)在室温下储存超过10年的相同存档血斑的3.2毫米打孔样本,以及来自184名普通人群新生儿的新鲜血斑样本,评估了两种亚硫酸氢盐转化方法。性能标准为:(i)所筛查疾病的诊断敏感性和特异性;(ii)反应失败率;(iii)组间mDNA的变异性。

结果

两种方法在区分FXS和个体15号染色体印记障碍方面均显示出100%的敏感性和特异性。与QIAcube HT分别为19.34%和2.56%相比,IsoPure对SNRPN的反应失败率为0.365%,对FMR1的反应失败率为0.74%,大多数失败反应源自存档血斑。IsoPure在神经典型和疾病特异性范围内的mDNA值变异性较低。

结论

IsoPure系统表现出卓越性能,尤其是对存档样本,在需要对数量和质量有限的材料进行高通量mDNA分析的筛查和诊断测试中有更广泛的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e643/12369608/aec8ea9a7f7b/IEPI_A_2544530_F0001_OC.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验