Nigam Manisha, Punia Bajrang, Dimri Deen Bandhu, Mishra Abhay Prakash, Radu Andrei-Flavius, Bungau Gabriela
Department of Biochemistry, Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, Srinagar Garhwal 246174, Uttarakhand, India.
Cosmetics and Natural Products Research Center (CosNat), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand.
Cells. 2025 Aug 6;14(15):1207. doi: 10.3390/cells14151207.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are often seen solely as harmful byproducts of oxidative metabolism, yet evidence reveals their paradoxical roles in both promoting and inhibiting cancer progression. Despite advances, precise context-dependent mechanisms by which ROS modulate oncogenic signaling, therapeutic response, and tumor microenvironment dynamics remain unclear. Specifically, the spatial and temporal aspects of ROS regulation (i.e., the distinct effects of mitochondrial versus cytosolic ROS on the PI3K/Akt and NF-κB pathways, and the differential cellular outcomes driven by acute versus chronic ROS exposure) have been underexplored. Additionally, the specific contributions of ROS-generating enzymes, like NOX isoforms and xanthine oxidase, to tumor microenvironment remodeling and immune modulation remain poorly understood. This review synthesizes current findings with a focus on these critical gaps, offering novel mechanistic insights into the dualistic nature of ROS in cancer biology. By systematically integrating data on ROS source-specific functions and redox-sensitive signaling pathways, the complex interplay between ROS concentration, localization, and persistence is elucidated, revealing how these factors dictate the paradoxical support of tumor progression or induction of cancer cell death. Particular attention is given to antioxidant mechanisms, including NRF2-mediated responses, that may undermine the efficacy of ROS-targeted therapies. Recent breakthroughs in redox biosensors (i.e., redox-sensitive fluorescent proteins, HyPer variants, and peroxiredoxin-FRET constructs) enable precise, real-time ROS imaging across subcellular compartments. Translational advances, including redox-modulating drugs and synthetic lethality strategies targeting glutathione or NADPH dependencies, further highlight actionable vulnerabilities. This refined understanding advances the field by highlighting context-specific vulnerabilities in tumor redox biology and guiding more precise therapeutic strategies. Continued research on redox-regulated signaling and its interplay with inflammation and therapy resistance is essential to unravel ROS dynamics in tumors and develop targeted, context-specific interventions harnessing their dual roles.
活性氧(ROS)通常仅被视为氧化代谢的有害副产物,但有证据表明它们在促进和抑制癌症进展方面具有矛盾的作用。尽管取得了进展,但ROS调节致癌信号、治疗反应和肿瘤微环境动态的精确的上下文依赖机制仍不清楚。具体而言,ROS调节的时空方面(即线粒体ROS与胞质ROS对PI3K/Akt和NF-κB途径的不同影响,以及急性与慢性ROS暴露所驱动的不同细胞结果)尚未得到充分研究。此外,ROS生成酶,如NOX亚型和黄嘌呤氧化酶,对肿瘤微环境重塑和免疫调节的具体贡献仍知之甚少。本综述综合了当前的研究结果,重点关注这些关键差距,为ROS在癌症生物学中的二元性质提供了新的机制见解。通过系统地整合关于ROS源特异性功能和氧化还原敏感信号通路的数据,阐明了ROS浓度、定位和持续性之间的复杂相互作用,揭示了这些因素如何决定对肿瘤进展的矛盾支持或癌细胞死亡的诱导。特别关注抗氧化机制,包括NRF2介导的反应,这些机制可能会削弱ROS靶向治疗的疗效。氧化还原生物传感器(即氧化还原敏感荧光蛋白、HyPer变体和过氧化物酶-FRET构建体)的最新突破使得能够在亚细胞区室中进行精确的实时ROS成像。包括氧化还原调节药物和针对谷胱甘肽或NADPH依赖性的合成致死策略在内的转化进展,进一步突出了可操作的脆弱性。这种更精确的理解通过突出肿瘤氧化还原生物学中特定于上下文的脆弱性并指导更精确的治疗策略,推动了该领域的发展。继续研究氧化还原调节信号及其与炎症和治疗抗性的相互作用,对于揭示肿瘤中的ROS动态以及开发利用其双重作用的靶向、特定于上下文的干预措施至关重要。