• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种改良吻合器痔切除术技术,以优化黏膜切除标本并改善手术效果。

A modified stapled hemorrhoidectomy technique to optimize mucosectomy specimen and improve outcomes.

作者信息

Campos Fábio Guilherme, Moraes Paula Gabriela Melo, Martins Pablo Veloso, Bustamante-Lopez Leonardo Alfonso, Martinez Carlos Augusto Real

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

Hospital das Clínicas, Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

出版信息

Sao Paulo Med J. 2025 Aug 11;143(4):e2023435. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0435.R1.29112024. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0435.R1.29112024
PMID:40802349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12341433/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease has undergone numerous modifications in recent decades. Among the technical options, stapled hemorrhoidopexy is currently considered an optimal alternative because it provides a less painful recovery. However, many reports have associated this technique with higher recurrence rates than excisional techniques.

OBJECTIVES

This manuscript presents a technical modification that aims to provide more extensive mucosectomy with mechanical hemorrhoidopexy.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The present technical modification was developed and has been recently used in two hospitals in São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

METHODS

To achieve this, we placed a circumferential submucosal suture at the 3 o'clock position in the clockwise direction. When the left lateral position (9 o'clock) was reached, a loop of 2-0 non-absorbable suture thread was passed around the continuous suture and retracted to the left. Subsequently, the original suture progressed towards the point on the right lateral side, where it was started.

RESULTS

Specifically, the modification consists of establishing two traction points from the pursestring suture; thus, the rectal mucosa entering the stapler head will be more uniform, and the retrieved mucosal strip will present a greater height. These features may play a role in effectively reducing mucosal prolapse and alleviating the symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed modification of the original operative technique is simple and aims to improve postoperative results by increasing the height of the mucosal specimen to be resected, thereby reducing long-term recurrence. In the future, this hypothesis will be tested in a randomized study comparing the mucosectomy height and postoperative outcomes of both technical options (classical and present).

摘要

背景

近几十年来,痔病的外科治疗经历了众多改良。在各种技术选择中,吻合器痔上黏膜环切术目前被认为是一种理想的替代方法,因为它能使恢复过程疼痛较轻。然而,许多报告指出该技术的复发率高于切除技术。

目的

本文介绍一种技术改良方法,旨在通过机械性痔固定术实现更广泛的黏膜切除。

设计与地点

本技术改良方法已研发出来,最近在巴西圣保罗市的两家医院应用。

方法

为实现这一目标,我们在3点钟位置沿顺时针方向放置一圈黏膜下缝线。当到达左侧卧位(9点钟)时,将一根2-0不可吸收缝线绕过连续缝线并向左牵拉。随后,原来的缝线继续向右侧开始的点推进。

结果

具体而言,该改良方法包括从荷包缝线上建立两个牵引点;这样,进入吻合器头部的直肠黏膜会更均匀,切除的黏膜条高度也会更高。这些特点可能有助于有效减少黏膜脱垂并缓解症状。

结论

对原手术技术的改良方法简单,旨在通过增加待切除黏膜标本的高度来改善术后效果,从而降低长期复发率。未来,将通过一项随机研究对这两种技术方案(传统方法和改良方法)的黏膜切除高度及术后结果进行比较,以验证这一假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/8f10cfa03785/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/6d695872aeae/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/ca9e4c22a631/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/add5bcb8db5f/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/93315deab987/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/bbf2df937b41/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/8f10cfa03785/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/6d695872aeae/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/ca9e4c22a631/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/add5bcb8db5f/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/93315deab987/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/bbf2df937b41/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c24/12341433/8f10cfa03785/1806-9460-spmj-143-4-e2023435-gf-06.jpg

相似文献

1
A modified stapled hemorrhoidectomy technique to optimize mucosectomy specimen and improve outcomes.一种改良吻合器痔切除术技术,以优化黏膜切除标本并改善手术效果。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2025 Aug 11;143(4):e2023435. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0435.R1.29112024. eCollection 2025.
2
Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与传统手术治疗痔疮的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD005393. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005393.pub2.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy).痔脱垂手术(吻合器痔上黏膜环切术)的系统评价
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Jun;50(6):878-92. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0852-3.
5
Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与传统痔切除术的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Nov;47(11):1837-45. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0679-8.
6
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
7
Morphological, functional and neurological outcomes of craniectomy versus cranial vault remodeling for isolated nonsyndromic synostosis of the sagittal suture: a systematic review.颅骨切除术与颅骨重塑术治疗孤立性非综合征性矢状缝早闭的形态学、功能及神经学预后:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep;13(9):309-68. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2470.
8
Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery.与传统的痔切除术相比,吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)术后内痔的远期复发率更高。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Sep;50(9):1297-305. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0308-4.
9
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
10
Can we improve time to patency with vasoepididymostomy with an innovative epididymal occlusion stitch?我们能否通过一种创新的附睾结扎缝线来改善吻合术的通畅时间?
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Jul-Aug;50(4):504-506. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0222.

本文引用的文献

1
A patient tailored approach to the surgical treatment of hemorrhoids leads to equal satisfaction following hemorrhoidectomy, stapled hemorrhoidopexy or a combination of both.针对痔病的个体化手术治疗方法与痔切除术、吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术或两者联合治疗后的满意度相当。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jun 14;408(1):233. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02969-3.
2
IS IT POSSIBLE TO OPTIMIZE STAPLED HEMORRHOIDOPEXY OUTCOMES BY ENLARGING OPERATIVE CRITERIA INDICATIONS? RESULTS OF A TAILORED PROCEDURE WITH ASSOCIATED RESECTION IN A COMPARATIVE PERSONAL SERIES.是否可以通过扩大手术指征来优化吻合器痔环切术的疗效?一项个体化手术联合相关切除术的比较系列研究结果。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2022 Nov 25;35:e1696. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020220002e1696. eCollection 2022.
3
Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: "Mucosectomy or Not Only Mucosectomy, This Is the Problem".吻合器痔上黏膜环切术:“是否行黏膜切除,这是个问题” 。
Front Surg. 2021 Mar 12;8:655257. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.655257. eCollection 2021.
4
Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: Technique and Long Term Results.吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术:技术与长期疗效。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021 Jan-Feb;116(1):102-108. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.116.1.102.
5
Stapled Surgery for Hemorrhoidal Prolapse: From the Beginning to Modern Times.痔脱垂的吻合器手术:从起源到现代
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2021;16(1):39-53. doi: 10.2174/1574887115666200310164519.
6
Milligan-Morgan (Open) Versus Ferguson Haemorrhoidectomy (Closed): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials.米利根-摩根(开放式)与弗格森痔切除术(封闭式):已发表随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1509-19. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3419-z.
7
Treatment of hemorrhoids: A coloproctologist's view.痔疮的治疗:一位结直肠外科医生的观点。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 21;21(31):9245-52. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9245.