Yoshino Atsuo, Ushio Kai, Nakamura Ryuji, Shiota Shigehito, Katagiri Tomoaki, Nishihara Kiriko, Moriwaki Katsuyuki, Anno Kozo, Mikami Yukio, Tsutsumi Yasuo
Health Service Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
Center for Brain, Mind and KANSEI Sciences Research, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e100243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100243.
Presenteeism, defined as reduced work efficiency due to health issues despite attending work, accounts for a substantial proportion of labour productivity loss. Although pain significantly impacts presenteeism, the relationship between pain and presenteeism remains poorly understood due to the multifaceted nature of pain, encompassing psychosocial factors and daily functioning. This study aimed to identify which of these factors are significantly associated with presenteeism among employees.
Cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaires and generalised additive model analysis.
Multiple workplaces (including a university and hospitals) in Japan.
Employed individuals (n=212, age range: 20-65 years; 59 males and 153 females) participated. They were recruited through workplace bulletin boards, email announcements and direct invitations. Participants with and without chronic pain were included.
Participants completed self-report measures, including the Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), Beck Depression Inventory-second edition (BDI-II), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0).
The results indicated that absolute HPQ was significantly associated with BDI-II scores (F=4.51, p=0.035). On the other hand, relative HPQ was influenced by SF-MPQ (F=3.76, p=0.005), PCS (F=4.16, p=0.014), STAI (F=5.62, p=0.019) and limited daily activities (F=13.25, p=0.00035).
These findings suggest that presenteeism is multifactorial, with pain, psychosocial factors and daily functioning playing critical roles. Moreover, the impact of depression on presenteeism differs from that of pain and anxiety. Therefore, tailored intervention approaches may be required for each factor, ultimately improving workplace productivity.
This study was preregistered at UMIN-CTR (UMIN000054797).
出勤主义被定义为尽管带病上班但工作效率降低,它在劳动生产率损失中占相当大的比例。虽然疼痛对出勤主义有显著影响,但由于疼痛具有多方面的性质,包括心理社会因素和日常功能,疼痛与出勤主义之间的关系仍未得到充分理解。本研究旨在确定这些因素中哪些与员工的出勤主义显著相关。
采用自填式问卷和广义相加模型分析的横断面研究。
日本的多个工作场所(包括一所大学和多家医院)。
在职人员(n = 212,年龄范围:20 - 65岁;男性59名,女性153名)参与。他们通过工作场所公告栏、电子邮件通知和直接邀请招募而来。纳入了有慢性疼痛和无慢性疼痛的参与者。
参与者完成自我报告测量,包括健康与工作绩效问卷(HPQ)、简短麦吉尔疼痛问卷(SF - MPQ)、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)、贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI - II)、状态 - 特质焦虑量表(STAI)和世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)。
结果表明,绝对HPQ与BDI - II得分显著相关(F = 4.51,p = 0.035)。另一方面,相对HPQ受SF - MPQ(F = 3.76,p = 0.005)(PCS,F = 4.16,p = 0.014)、STAI(F = 5.62,p = 0.019)和有限的日常活动(F = 13.25,p = 0.00035)影响。
这些发现表明出勤主义是多因素的,疼痛、心理社会因素和日常功能起着关键作用。此外,抑郁对出勤主义的影响与疼痛和焦虑不同。因此,可能需要针对每个因素采取量身定制的干预方法,最终提高工作场所的生产率。
本研究在UMIN - CTR(UMIN000054797)进行了预注册。