Suppr超能文献

绞颈陷阱不人道且无选择性,应予以禁止。

Killing Neck Snares Are Inhumane and Non-Selective, and Should Be Banned.

作者信息

Proulx Gilbert

机构信息

Alpha Wildlife Research & Management, 229 Lilac Terrace, Sherwood Park, AB T8H 1W3, Canada.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2025 Jul 28;15(15):2220. doi: 10.3390/ani15152220.

Abstract

In North America, where fur trapping remains an active practice, killing neck snares continue to be used for capturing canids, particularly red fox (), coyote (), and gray wolf (). However, over the last 50 years, scientific studies have consistently demonstrated that killing neck snares are inhumane-meaning that snared animals do not lose consciousness within five minutes and may remain alive for hours-and non-selective, often capturing a wide range of non-target wild and domestic animals. This non-selectivity can contribute to the local extirpation of certain species. The continued use of killing neck snares reflects a disregard for the welfare of wild mammals and poses risks to the sustainability of their populations. This persistence appears to be driven by misinformation, widespread myths, and inadequately implemented international trapping standards. These issues lead to critical questions about what must be performed to prohibit the use of these devices.

摘要

在北美,毛皮诱捕仍是一项活跃的活动,致死性颈部圈套仍被用于捕获犬科动物,尤其是赤狐(Vulpes vulpes)、郊狼(Canis latrans)和灰狼(Canis lupus)。然而,在过去50年里,科学研究一直表明,致死性颈部圈套是不人道的——这意味着被套住的动物不会在五分钟内失去意识,可能会存活数小时——而且没有选择性,常常会捕获各种各样的非目标野生动物和家畜。这种缺乏选择性可能导致某些物种在当地灭绝。继续使用致死性颈部圈套反映出对野生哺乳动物福利的漠视,并对其种群的可持续性构成风险。这种情况的持续存在似乎是由错误信息、广泛流传的谣言以及未充分实施的国际诱捕标准所驱动的。这些问题引发了关于必须采取什么措施来禁止使用这些装置的关键问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9832/12345445/af0a70397d99/animals-15-02220-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验