Anania Caterina, Cuomo Barbara, D'Auria Enza, Decimo Fabio, Giannì Giuliana, Indirli Giovanni Cosimo, Manca Enrica, Mondì Filippo, Pendezza Erica, Sartorio Marco Ugo Andrea, Calvani Mauro
Department of Maternal Infantile and Urological Science, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Central Operative Unit of Pediatrics and Allergy Center for Children and Adults, Santa Rosa Hospital, 01010 Viterbo, Italy.
Nutrients. 2025 Jul 27;17(15):2448. doi: 10.3390/nu17152448.
Alternative proteins denote non-traditional, high-protein foods. These innovative sources aim to compete with conventional animal products by providing protein-rich, sustainable, nutritious, and flavorful options. Currently, five main categories of alternative proteins are being developed: plant-based proteins, cultured meat, single-cell proteins, edible insects, and seaweed. Nonetheless, several chemical and microbiological food safety hazards are associated with these alternatives Incorporating novel protein sources into food products may heighten the prevalence of existing food allergies. This could arise from extracting proteins from their natural matrices and utilizing them at significantly higher concentrations. Additionally, the introduction of new proteins may lead to the development of novel food allergies. Proteins that are currently seldom or never consumed may cause primary sensitisation or trigger cross-reactivity with known allergens. To date, alternative proteins have not been thoroughly studied for their allergenic potential, and there is no standardised method for assessing this risk. This review aims to explore non-traditional protein sources, discussing their nutritional and functional properties, as well as their potential allergenicity based on available research. We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase databases. We used specific keywords and MESH terms. A total of 157 studies were included in the review. The studies reviewed in our analysis reveal significant limitations, such as inconsistent methodologies, limited participant numbers, and a lack of long-term data, which hinder the ability to make clear conclusions regarding the safety of these new proteins for individuals with allergies. To address current challenge, future research should integrate food science, regulatory perspectives and advanced technologies.
替代蛋白是指非传统的高蛋白食品。这些创新来源旨在通过提供富含蛋白质、可持续、营养丰富且美味的选择来与传统动物产品竞争。目前,正在开发五类主要的替代蛋白:植物基蛋白、养殖肉、单细胞蛋白、食用昆虫和海藻。尽管如此,这些替代品存在一些化学和微生物食品安全危害。将新型蛋白质来源纳入食品可能会增加现有食物过敏的发生率。这可能是由于从天然基质中提取蛋白质并以显著更高的浓度使用它们所致。此外,新蛋白质的引入可能会导致新型食物过敏的出现。目前很少或从未食用过的蛋白质可能会引起初次致敏或引发与已知过敏原的交叉反应。迄今为止,替代蛋白的致敏潜力尚未得到充分研究,也没有评估这种风险的标准化方法。本综述旨在探索非传统蛋白质来源,讨论它们的营养和功能特性,以及基于现有研究的潜在致敏性。我们在PubMed和Embase数据库中进行了文献检索。我们使用了特定的关键词和医学主题词。本综述共纳入157项研究。我们分析中所综述的研究揭示了显著的局限性,如方法不一致、参与者数量有限以及缺乏长期数据,这些都阻碍了我们就这些新蛋白质对过敏个体的安全性得出明确结论。为应对当前挑战,未来的研究应整合食品科学、监管视角和先进技术。