Franklin James, Robinson Charlotte, Ferreira Carlos, Shumbayawonda Elizabeth, Jhaveri Kartik
Department of Medical Science & Public Health, Institute of Medical Imaging and Visualisation, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK.
Radiology Department, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading RG1 5AN, UK.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 6;14(15):5530. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155530.
Identifying high-grade strictures (HGS) in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) relies upon subjective assessments of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Quantitative MRCP (MRCP+) provides objective evaluation of MRCP examinations, which may help make these assessments more consistent and improve patient management and selection for intervention. We evaluated the impact of MRCP+ on clinicians' confidence in diagnosing HGS in patients with PSC. : Three expert abdominal radiologists independently assessed 28 patients with PSC. Radiological reads of MRCPs were performed twice, in a random order, three weeks apart, then a third time with MRCP+. HGS presence was recorded on semi-quantitative confidence scales. The cases where readers definitively agreed on presence/absence of HGS were used to assess inter- and intra-reader agreement and confidence. : When using MRCP alone, high intra-reader agreement was observed in identifying HGS within both intra- and extrahepatic ducts (64.3% and 70.8%, respectively), while inter-reader agreement was significantly lower for intrahepatic ducts (42.9%) than extrahepatic ducts (66.1%) ( < 0.01). Using MRCP+ in the third read significantly improved inter-reader agreement for intrahepatic HGS detection to 67.9% versus baseline reads ( = 0.02) and was comparable with extrahepatic ducts. Reader confidence tended to increase when supplemented with MRCP+, and inter-reader variability decreased. MRCP+ metrics had good performance in identifying HGS in both extra-hepatic (AUC:0.85) and intra-hepatic ducts (AUC:0.75). : MRCP evaluation supported by quantitative metrics tended to increase individual reader confidence and reduce inter-reader variability for detecting HGS. Our results indicate that MRCP+ might help standardize MRCP assessment and subsequent management for patients with PSC.
原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)患者中高级别狭窄(HGS)的识别依赖于磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)的主观评估。定量MRCP(MRCP+)可对MRCP检查进行客观评估,这可能有助于使这些评估更具一致性,并改善患者管理及干预选择。我们评估了MRCP+对临床医生诊断PSC患者HGS信心的影响。三位腹部放射学专家独立评估了28例PSC患者。MRCP的影像学解读分两次进行,随机排序,间隔三周,然后第三次使用MRCP+进行解读。HGS的存在情况通过半定量信心量表记录。读者对HGS是否存在达成明确共识的病例用于评估读者间和读者内的一致性及信心。单独使用MRCP时,在识别肝内和肝外胆管的HGS方面均观察到较高的读者内一致性(分别为64.3%和70.8%),而肝内胆管的读者间一致性(42.9%)显著低于肝外胆管(66.1%)(P<0.01)。在第三次解读中使用MRCP+显著提高了肝内HGS检测的读者间一致性,从基线解读时的42.9%提高到67.9%(P = 0.02),与肝外胆管相当。补充MRCP+后读者信心趋于增加,读者间变异性降低。MRCP+指标在识别肝外(AUC:0.85)和肝内胆管(AUC:0.75)的HGS方面表现良好。由定量指标支持的MRCP评估倾向于提高个体读者的信心,并减少检测HGS时的读者间变异性。我们的结果表明,MRCP+可能有助于标准化PSC患者的MRCP评估及后续管理。