Monkkonen Paavo, Barrall Aaron, Echavarria Aurora
Urban Planning, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Hous Policy Debate. 2025;35(2):185-209. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2024.2337033. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
A 2018 California law requires local governments to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH) in their General Plan's housing element. This paper examines how eight municipalities reacted to this requirement in three areas of their 2021 plans: the analysis of fair housing issues, proposed fair housing programs, and the location of sites identified for low-income housing development. We consider whether these cities' over 200 fair housing programs are meaningful actions by evaluating their potential impact, and measure the distribution of proposed sites for new low-income housing across neighborhoods. The cities created many new programs in response to the mandate; however, most programs do not meaningfully advance fair housing goals. Moreover, most cities do not modify land-use plans to allow affordable housing in affluent neighborhoods. Additionally, we find a mismatch in the plans. The affluent, majority-white cities that developed more meaningful fair housing programs continued to concentrate sites for affordable housing in their least affluent neighborhoods. Our analysis of potential program impact allows us to identify AFFH oversight challenges and make recommendations for AFFH guidelines. We focus on California, but the research is relevant to federal AFFH implementation and raises questions about how to best advance fair housing goals.
2018年加利福尼亚州的一项法律要求地方政府在其总体规划的住房要素中积极推进公平住房(AFFH)。本文考察了八个城市在其2021年规划的三个方面对这一要求的反应:公平住房问题分析、拟议的公平住房计划,以及确定用于低收入住房开发的地块位置。我们通过评估这些城市200多个公平住房计划的潜在影响来考量它们是否是有意义的行动,并衡量新的低收入住房拟议地块在各社区的分布情况。这些城市针对该指令制定了许多新计划;然而,大多数计划并未切实推进公平住房目标。此外,大多数城市并未修改土地使用规划以在富裕社区允许建设经济适用房。此外,我们发现这些规划存在不匹配之处。制定了更有意义的公平住房计划的富裕、白人占多数的城市,仍继续将经济适用房地块集中在其最不富裕的社区。我们对潜在计划影响的分析使我们能够识别公平住房监督方面的挑战,并为公平住房指南提出建议。我们聚焦于加利福尼亚州,但该研究与联邦公平住房实施相关,并引发了关于如何最好地推进公平住房目标的问题。