Ravi Praveen Kumar, Swain Sashikanta, Sahu Abhijit, Rout Sipra, Balamurugan Appakalai N, Mishra Pravash Ranjan
Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Wendy Novak Diabetes Institute, Norton Children's Research Institute, Norton Healthcare, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Research Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
J Diabetes Res. 2025 Aug 6;2025:8940783. doi: 10.1155/jdr/8940783. eCollection 2025.
The outcome of pancreatic islet transplantation surgery is influenced by factors like islet volume, purity, and dimensions. Single paraffin section measurement may underestimate islet diameter. Researchers have identified limitations in measuring islet equivalent quantity. This study quantified maximum islet diameter using serial sections and compared it with paraffin sections. We also evaluated actual islet volume and compared it with IEQ based on diameter measurements. This study utilized pancreatic tissue from six adult human samples. Serial sections were stained immunohistochemically using anti-synaptophysin antibody. Islets were identified and measured using serial sections to determine their diameter and volume. The maximum average diameter across sections was used to calculate the islet diameter. Islet volume was calculated by summing areas across sections and correcting for section thickness and interval. We compared the calculated IEQ based on the diameter and volume. The study revealed significant discrepancies between pancreatic islet diameter measured from single paraffin sections and those determined from serial sections. The mean sectional diameter was 23.37% smaller than the actual diameter ( < 0.0001), with larger islets showing a more significant underestimation. IEQ based on diameter was overestimated by 87.51% compared to IEQ based on actual volume, with large islets contributing significantly to this discrepancy (111.7%). Single paraffin section analyses underestimate islet dimensions, especially for islets > 125m in diameter. Using conversion factors from this study provides accurate size assessments. To enhance transplantation accuracy, it is essential to use robust size calculations rather than binning. Using the islet diameter tends to overestimate their volume, particularly when the islet index is ≥ 1 (as most islets are larger than 150 m in diameter). This overestimation increases the risk of unfavorable transplantation outcomes. Thus, IEQ should be adjusted to the upper range when the islet index is ≥ 1, accounting for the potential overestimation of islet volume.
胰岛移植手术的结果受胰岛体积、纯度和尺寸等因素影响。单石蜡切片测量可能会低估胰岛直径。研究人员已确定在测量胰岛当量数量方面存在局限性。本研究使用连续切片对最大胰岛直径进行定量,并将其与石蜡切片进行比较。我们还评估了实际胰岛体积,并将其与基于直径测量的胰岛当量进行比较。本研究使用了来自六个成年人类样本的胰腺组织。连续切片使用抗突触素抗体进行免疫组织化学染色。通过连续切片识别并测量胰岛,以确定其直径和体积。使用各切片的最大平均直径来计算胰岛直径。通过将各切片的面积相加并校正切片厚度和间隔来计算胰岛体积。我们比较了基于直径和体积计算的胰岛当量。该研究揭示了从单石蜡切片测量的胰岛直径与从连续切片确定的胰岛直径之间存在显著差异。平均切片直径比实际直径小23.37%(<0.0001),较大的胰岛显示出更显著的低估。基于直径的胰岛当量比基于实际体积的胰岛当量高估了87.51%,大胰岛对这种差异贡献显著(111.7%)。单石蜡切片分析会低估胰岛尺寸,尤其是对于直径>125μm的胰岛。使用本研究中的转换因子可提供准确的尺寸评估。为提高移植准确性,使用可靠的尺寸计算而非分类至关重要。使用胰岛直径往往会高估其体积,特别是当胰岛指数≥1时(因为大多数胰岛直径大于150μm)。这种高估会增加移植结果不佳 的风险。因此,当胰岛指数≥1时,应将胰岛当量调整到较高范围,以考虑到胰岛体积可能被高估的情况。