• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估社交媒体平台上与缺血性坏死相关的内容。

Evaluating Avascular Necrosis-Related Content Across Social Media Platforms.

作者信息

Smith Gabriella B, Gussner Anna V, Hofmann Grady H, Duru Nneoma O, Shea Kevin G

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jul 14;17(7):e87914. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87914. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.87914
PMID:40809640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12349748/
Abstract

Background Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the bone can progress to subchondral collapse, often requiring surgical intervention. Given the debilitating nature of this condition, patients may seek information and support through social media. AVN-related content on social media platforms remains uncharacterized in the literature. This study aimed to analyze the type and reach of AVN-related content across social media platforms. Methods The search terms "avascular necrosis" and "osteonecrosis" were used to identify social media content on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok between October 31, 2024, and November 4, 2024. Posts with the highest engagement were reviewed, and descriptive statistics were recorded. Results Across all four platforms, engagement metrics for "avascular necrosis" were consistently higher than for "osteonecrosis." The following findings were noted for the search term "avascular necrosis." On Facebook, five groups with a combined membership of 30,805 shared 492 posts monthly. Three groups provided patient support, while the remaining two focused on a patient story and treatment advice; only one group had a physician moderator. Instagram's top five hashtags had over 24,000 posts. On YouTube, the five most-viewed videos - with 1.78 million combined views - addressed topics such as patient experiences, surgical techniques, and education. TikTok had 135 videos for "avascular necrosis," with the most popular video receiving 5.6 million views and 163,200 likes. The top five TikTok hashtags had a total of 2,218 posts. Conclusion AVN-related content is widely available on social media platforms, offering patients access to support networks and informational resources. However, concerns regarding the reliability and accuracy of educational content persist. Physicians treating AVN patients should familiarize themselves with this digital landscape to address patient misconceptions and share credible sources. Future educational initiatives could involve creating physician-led social media content to enhance the accessibility and quality of AVN-related resources.

摘要

背景

骨缺血性坏死(AVN)可发展为软骨下塌陷,通常需要手术干预。鉴于这种疾病的致残性,患者可能会通过社交媒体寻求信息和支持。社交媒体平台上与AVN相关的内容在文献中仍未得到描述。本研究旨在分析社交媒体平台上与AVN相关内容的类型和传播范围。方法:使用搜索词“avascular necrosis”和“osteonecrosis”来识别2024年10月31日至2024年11月4日期间在Facebook、Instagram、YouTube和TikTok上的社交媒体内容。对参与度最高的帖子进行了审查,并记录了描述性统计数据。结果:在所有四个平台上,“avascular necrosis”的参与度指标始终高于“osteonecrosis”。对于搜索词“avascular necrosis”,有以下发现。在Facebook上,五个群组共有30805名成员,每月分享492篇帖子。三个群组提供患者支持,其余两个专注于患者故事和治疗建议;只有一个群组有医生作为管理员。Instagram上排名前五的主题标签有超过24000篇帖子。在YouTube上,观看次数最多的五个视频——总观看次数为178万次——涉及患者经历、手术技术和教育等主题。TikTok上有135个关于“avascular necrosis”的视频,最受欢迎的视频获得了560万次观看和163,200个赞。TikTok上排名前五的主题标签共有2218篇帖子。结论:与AVN相关的内容在社交媒体平台上广泛存在,为患者提供了获得支持网络和信息资源的途径。然而,对教育内容的可靠性和准确性的担忧仍然存在。治疗AVN患者的医生应熟悉这一数字环境,以解决患者的误解并分享可靠的信息来源。未来的教育举措可能包括创建由医生主导的社交媒体内容,以提高与AVN相关资源的可及性和质量。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Avascular Necrosis-Related Content Across Social Media Platforms.评估社交媒体平台上与缺血性坏死相关的内容。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 14;17(7):e87914. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87914. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Evaluating the quality of osteonecrosis and avascular necrosis content on youtube: a multidimensional analysis using DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS tools.评估YouTube上关于骨坏死和缺血性坏死内容的质量:使用DISCERN、《美国医学会杂志》和GQS工具进行的多维度分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 22;20(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06116-0.
4
Quality and Dissemination of Uterine Fibroid Health Information on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.抖音和哔哩哔哩上子宫肌瘤健康信息的质量与传播:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 1;9:e75120. doi: 10.2196/75120.
5
Most Patients With Bone Sarcomas Seek Emotional Support and Information About Other Patients' Experiences: A Thematic Analysis.大多数骨肉瘤患者寻求情感支持和其他患者经验的信息:主题分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):161-171. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002761. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
6
Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study.抖音、快手和哔哩哔哩上与食管癌相关视频的信息质量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2245. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23475-9.
7
Oocyte cryopreservation on TikTok and Instagram: Who is teaching whom?TikTok 和 Instagram 上的卵母细胞冷冻:谁在教谁?
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Jul;41(7):1763-1770. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03110-z. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
8
Fake News? Quantifying the Prevalence of Misinformation Related to Scoliosis on the TikTok Social Media Platform.假新闻?量化TikTok社交媒体平台上与脊柱侧弯相关的错误信息的流行程度。
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2025 May 27;12:100207. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100207. eCollection 2025 Aug.
9
The Most Popular Videos Promoting Breast Enhancement Products on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Content and User Engagement Analysis.TikTok上推广丰胸产品的最热门视频:横断面内容与用户参与度分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 6;27:e73336. doi: 10.2196/73336.
10
E-Cigarette Narratives of User-Generated Posts on Xiaohongshu in China: Content Analysis.中国小红书上用户生成帖子中的电子烟叙事:内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 3;27:e71173. doi: 10.2196/71173.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Factors for Corticosteroid-associated Osteonecrosis in Children: A National Database Study.儿童皮质类固醇相关骨坏死的危险因素:一项全国性数据库研究。
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2025 May 23;12:100199. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100199. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Cancer misinformation on social media.社交媒体上的癌症错误信息。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Sep-Oct;74(5):453-464. doi: 10.3322/caac.21857. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
3
Connecting Health and Technology: A Comprehensive Review of Social Media and Online Communities in Healthcare.连接健康与技术:医疗保健领域社交媒体和在线社区的全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Mar 1;16(3):e55361. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55361. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Building Authentic Connection in the Patient-Physician Relationship.在医患关系中建立真实的联系。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319231225996. doi: 10.1177/21501319231225996.
5
Use of Social Media for Patient Education in Dermatology: Narrative Review.社交媒体在皮肤科患者教育中的应用:叙述性综述
JMIR Dermatol. 2023 Apr 14;6:e42609. doi: 10.2196/42609.
6
Adolescent Anxiety and TikTok: An Exploratory Study.青少年焦虑与抖音:一项探索性研究。
Cureus. 2022 Dec 14;14(12):e32530. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32530. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Patient Involvement in Shared Decision-Making: Do Patients Rate Physicians and Nurses Differently?患者参与共同决策:患者对医生和护士的评价是否不同?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;19(21):14229. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114229.
8
Evaluating Information About Osteochondritis Dissecans Shared Across Social Media Platforms.评估社交媒体平台上共享的关于剥脱性骨软骨炎的信息。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022;42(10):627-630. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002244. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
9
Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Head-Overview and Current State of the Art.股骨头缺血性坏死概述及现状。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;19(12):7348. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127348.
10
Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.YouTube 是健康相关信息的可靠来源吗?一项系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 19;22(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z.