Phillips Meredith, Reber Sarah
UCLA.
UCLA and NBER.
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2022 Aug;14(3):198-234. doi: 10.1257/pol.20200515.
Although in-person college access programs can be effective, less is known about whether low-cost and scalable virtual interventions can achieve the same benefits. We evaluate two variants of a virtual college counseling program. Students randomly assigned to the program felt more supported applying to college and applied more broadly to four-year colleges, but were not more likely to be accepted or enroll. We analyze rich and extensive survey data to explore mechanisms and why the program did not improve college enrollment. We conclude that low-intensity programs may work for some students, but many probably need in-person and intensive help.
尽管面对面的大学入学辅导项目可能有效,但对于低成本且可扩展的虚拟干预措施能否带来同样的益处,我们了解得较少。我们评估了一个虚拟大学咨询项目的两种变体。被随机分配到该项目的学生在申请大学时感觉得到了更多支持,并且更广泛地申请了四年制大学,但被录取或入学的可能性并没有更高。我们分析了丰富且广泛的调查数据,以探究其中的机制以及该项目未能提高大学入学率的原因。我们得出结论,低强度项目可能对一些学生有效,但许多学生可能需要面对面的深入帮助。