• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于能力的阶梯式路径在提升高职学生人工智能素养中的开发与验证

Development and validation of a competency-based ladder pathway for AI literacy enhancement among higher vocational students.

作者信息

Hong Litian

机构信息

School of Smart Tourism, Business Administration, Zhejiang Technical Institute of Economics, Hangzhou, 310018, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 14;15(1):29898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15202-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-15202-6
PMID:40813428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12354849/
Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence across industries necessitates systematic AI literacy development in higher vocational education to prepare students for AI-driven professional environments. This study develops and validates a comprehensive competency-based ladder development pathway specifically designed to enhance AI literacy among vocational students. The research employs a mixed-methods approach combining theoretical framework construction, empirical investigation, and practical implementation validation. The three-tier pathway model integrates foundational cognitive, skills application, and comprehensive innovation layers to address diverse learning needs while maintaining progression standards. Through empirical investigation involving 2850 students across 15 institutions, the study identifies distinct learner profiles and competency deficits, informing personalized development strategies. The validation experiment with 420 participants demonstrates significant improvements across all competency dimensions, with overall AI literacy gains of 56.0% and sustained retention rates exceeding 85% at six-month follow-up. The innovative pedagogical approaches incorporate project-driven learning, experiential methodologies, and hybrid delivery models to optimize competency development. The comprehensive evaluation framework provides robust assessment tools that balance formative and summative approaches while maintaining alignment with industry standards. Results indicate that students in the ladder pathway intervention achieved 34.7% higher cognitive assessment scores, 42.3% superior performance on skills application tasks, and 28.9% better innovation competency outcomes compared to traditional instruction. This research contributes to the theoretical understanding of competency-based AI education while providing practical implementation guidance for enhancing workforce readiness in the artificial intelligence era.

摘要

人工智能在各行业的迅速整合,使得高等职业教育有必要系统地开展人工智能素养培养,以便让学生为人工智能驱动的专业环境做好准备。本研究开发并验证了一种基于能力的综合阶梯式发展路径,该路径专门设计用于提高职业学生的人工智能素养。该研究采用了一种混合方法,将理论框架构建、实证调查和实际实施验证相结合。这个三层路径模型整合了基础认知、技能应用和综合创新层面,以满足多样化的学习需求,同时保持进阶标准。通过对15所院校的2850名学生进行实证调查,该研究识别出了不同的学习者特征和能力缺陷,为个性化发展策略提供了依据。对420名参与者进行的验证实验表明,在所有能力维度上都有显著提升,在六个月的随访中,人工智能素养总体提升了56.0%,持续保持率超过85%。创新的教学方法包括项目驱动学习、体验式方法和混合教学模式,以优化能力发展。综合评估框架提供了强大的评估工具,在平衡形成性和总结性方法的同时,保持与行业标准的一致性。结果表明,与传统教学相比,处于阶梯式路径干预中的学生在认知评估分数上高出34.7%,在技能应用任务上表现优42.3%,在创新能力成果上高出28.9%。本研究有助于从理论上理解基于能力的人工智能教育,同时为提高人工智能时代劳动力的准备程度提供实际实施指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/a1b7b437a694/41598_2025_15202_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/348f0c7a8392/41598_2025_15202_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/215d77be93f8/41598_2025_15202_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/e4c296a69a21/41598_2025_15202_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/58db4995d60d/41598_2025_15202_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/bc2897e5e05a/41598_2025_15202_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/a1b7b437a694/41598_2025_15202_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/348f0c7a8392/41598_2025_15202_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/215d77be93f8/41598_2025_15202_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/e4c296a69a21/41598_2025_15202_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/58db4995d60d/41598_2025_15202_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/bc2897e5e05a/41598_2025_15202_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab41/12354849/a1b7b437a694/41598_2025_15202_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a competency-based ladder pathway for AI literacy enhancement among higher vocational students.基于能力的阶梯式路径在提升高职学生人工智能素养中的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 14;15(1):29898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15202-6.
2
Enhancing education for children with ASD: a review of evaluation and measurement in AI tool implementation.加强自闭症谱系障碍儿童的教育:人工智能工具实施中的评估与测量综述
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Mar 13:1-18. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2025.2477678.
3
Navigating the frontier of AI-assisted student assignments: challenges, skills, and solutions.探索人工智能辅助学生作业的前沿领域:挑战、技能与解决方案。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2025 Sep 1;49(3):633-639. doi: 10.1152/advan.00253.2024. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
4
The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review.人工智能在护理教育与实践中的作用:综合述评
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 4;27:e69881. doi: 10.2196/69881.
5
A Comparative Bicentric Study on Ultrasound Education for Students: App- and AI-Supported Learning Versus Traditional Hands-on Instruction (AI-Teach Study).一项针对学生的超声教育双中心比较研究:应用程序和人工智能支持的学习与传统实践指导(人工智能教学研究)。
Acad Radiol. 2025 Aug;32(8):4930-4938. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.024. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
6
Refining AI perspectives: assessing the impact of ai curricular on medical students' attitudes towards artificial intelligence.优化人工智能视角:评估人工智能课程对医学生对人工智能态度的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 25;25(1):1115. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07669-8.
7
The mediation effect of AI self-efficacy between AI literacy and learning engagement in college nursing students: A cross-sectional study.人工智能自我效能感在本科护生人工智能素养与学习投入之间的中介作用:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Aug;87:104499. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104499. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
8
Artificial intelligence and academic integrity in nursing education: A mixed methods study on usage, perceptions, and institutional implications.护理教育中的人工智能与学术诚信:一项关于使用情况、认知及机构影响的混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Oct;153:106796. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106796. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
9
Redefining Mentorship in Medical Education with Artificial Intelligence: A Delphi Study on the Feasibility and Implications.利用人工智能重新定义医学教育中的导师指导:关于可行性和影响的德尔菲研究
Teach Learn Med. 2025 Jun 18:1-11. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2025.2521001.
10
Integrative review of artificial intelligence applications in nursing: education, clinical practice, workload management, and professional perceptions.人工智能在护理中的应用综述:教育、临床实践、工作量管理及专业认知
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 1;13:1619378. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1619378. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes.对基于模拟的掌握学习及其转化成果的批判性综述。
Med Educ. 2014 Apr;48(4):375-85. doi: 10.1111/medu.12391.
2
Competence and competency-based nursing education: finding our way through the issues.能力与基于能力的护理教育:梳理诸多问题找到出路。
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 May;34(5):676-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
3
How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide No. 59.
自我决定理论如何帮助我们理解医学教育中的教与学过程。AMEE 指南第 59 号。
Med Teach. 2011;33(12):961-73. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.595435.
4
Competency-based medical education: theory to practice.基于能力的医学教育:理论与实践。
Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638-45. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190.
5
Shifting paradigms: from Flexner to competencies.范式转变:从弗莱克斯纳到能力本位
Acad Med. 2002 May;77(5):361-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200205000-00003.