Zhankorazova Aizhan, Tonti Giovanni, Khamitova Zaukiya, Toktarbay Bauyrzhan, Jumadilova Dinara, Bekbossynova Makhabbat, Khissamutdinov Nail, Dautov Tairkhan, Salustri Alessandro
School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Department of Cardiovascular Disease, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 14;15(1):29796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13966-5.
Hemodynamic forces (HDF), which reflect the forces exchanged between blood and cardiac tissues, can be derived from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Although normal values are reported for each imaging technique, no study has compared HDF values within the same cohort so far. We aimed to compare left ventricular (LV) HDF parameters obtained from CMR and TTE in healthy subjects. Twenty volunteers underwent both cine-CMR and 2D-TTE (within 7 days) at the Heart Center University Medical Center in Astana, Kazakhstan. Images were analyzed offline using dedicated software to extract standard volumetric, functional, strain, and HDF parameters: longitudinal (A-B) and transverse (L-S) HDF, L-S/A-B HDF ratio, and HDF vector angle. Statistical comparisons were performed with significance set at p < 0.05; Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement. TTE significantly underestimated LV volumes, ejection fraction, and global longitudinal strain compared to CMR. Similarly, HDF values were lower with TTE for both longitudinal and transverse forces (A-B HDF: 12.4 ± 3.4 vs. 26.1 ± 6.6; L-S HDF: 2.6 ± 1.2 vs. 5.2 ± 1.4; both p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis confirmed systematic underestimation of HDF by TTE. These findings suggest that TTE and CMR cannot be used interchangeably for HDF assessment, particularly in serial studies.
血流动力学力(HDF)反映了血液与心脏组织之间交换的力,可通过心脏磁共振成像(CMR)或经胸超声心动图(TTE)获得。尽管每种成像技术都有报告的正常值,但到目前为止,尚无研究在同一队列中比较HDF值。我们旨在比较健康受试者中通过CMR和TTE获得的左心室(LV)HDF参数。20名志愿者在哈萨克斯坦阿斯塔纳的心脏中心大学医学中心接受了电影CMR和二维TTE检查(在7天内)。使用专用软件对图像进行离线分析,以提取标准容积、功能、应变和HDF参数:纵向(A-B)和横向(L-S)HDF、L-S/A-B HDF比值以及HDF矢量角。进行统计学比较,显著性设定为p < 0.05;采用布兰德-奥特曼图评估一致性。与CMR相比,TTE显著低估了左心室容积、射血分数和整体纵向应变。同样,TTE测得的纵向和横向力的HDF值均较低(A-B HDF:1十二点四±3.4对2六点一±6.6;L-S HDF:2.6±1.2对5.2±1.4;均p < 0.001)。布兰德-奥特曼分析证实了TTE对HDF的系统性低估。这些发现表明,在HDF评估中,TTE和CMR不能互换使用,尤其是在系列研究中。