Suppr超能文献

经胸超声心动图与心脏磁共振成像测量健康成年人左心室血流动力学力的比较

Comparison of left ventricular hemodynamic forces measured by transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults.

作者信息

Zhankorazova Aizhan, Tonti Giovanni, Khamitova Zaukiya, Toktarbay Bauyrzhan, Jumadilova Dinara, Bekbossynova Makhabbat, Khissamutdinov Nail, Dautov Tairkhan, Salustri Alessandro

机构信息

School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.

Department of Cardiovascular Disease, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 14;15(1):29796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13966-5.

Abstract

Hemodynamic forces (HDF), which reflect the forces exchanged between blood and cardiac tissues, can be derived from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Although normal values are reported for each imaging technique, no study has compared HDF values within the same cohort so far. We aimed to compare left ventricular (LV) HDF parameters obtained from CMR and TTE in healthy subjects. Twenty volunteers underwent both cine-CMR and 2D-TTE (within 7 days) at the Heart Center University Medical Center in Astana, Kazakhstan. Images were analyzed offline using dedicated software to extract standard volumetric, functional, strain, and HDF parameters: longitudinal (A-B) and transverse (L-S) HDF, L-S/A-B HDF ratio, and HDF vector angle. Statistical comparisons were performed with significance set at p < 0.05; Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement. TTE significantly underestimated LV volumes, ejection fraction, and global longitudinal strain compared to CMR. Similarly, HDF values were lower with TTE for both longitudinal and transverse forces (A-B HDF: 12.4 ± 3.4 vs. 26.1 ± 6.6; L-S HDF: 2.6 ± 1.2 vs. 5.2 ± 1.4; both p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis confirmed systematic underestimation of HDF by TTE. These findings suggest that TTE and CMR cannot be used interchangeably for HDF assessment, particularly in serial studies.

摘要

血流动力学力(HDF)反映了血液与心脏组织之间交换的力,可通过心脏磁共振成像(CMR)或经胸超声心动图(TTE)获得。尽管每种成像技术都有报告的正常值,但到目前为止,尚无研究在同一队列中比较HDF值。我们旨在比较健康受试者中通过CMR和TTE获得的左心室(LV)HDF参数。20名志愿者在哈萨克斯坦阿斯塔纳的心脏中心大学医学中心接受了电影CMR和二维TTE检查(在7天内)。使用专用软件对图像进行离线分析,以提取标准容积、功能、应变和HDF参数:纵向(A-B)和横向(L-S)HDF、L-S/A-B HDF比值以及HDF矢量角。进行统计学比较,显著性设定为p < 0.05;采用布兰德-奥特曼图评估一致性。与CMR相比,TTE显著低估了左心室容积、射血分数和整体纵向应变。同样,TTE测得的纵向和横向力的HDF值均较低(A-B HDF:1十二点四±3.4对2六点一±6.6;L-S HDF:2.6±1.2对5.2±1.4;均p < 0.001)。布兰德-奥特曼分析证实了TTE对HDF的系统性低估。这些发现表明,在HDF评估中,TTE和CMR不能互换使用,尤其是在系列研究中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/480d/12354875/d97347450dcd/41598_2025_13966_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验