Suppr超能文献

四维血流磁共振成像的血流动力预测心脏再同步治疗后左心室重构。

Hemodynamic forces from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging predict left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy.

机构信息

Clinical Physiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Heart Failure and Valvular Heart Disease Section, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023 Aug 25;25(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00955-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB) may receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but current selection criteria are imprecise, and many patients have limited treatment response. Hemodynamic forces (HDF) have been suggested as a marker for CRT response. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate left ventricular (LV) HDF as a predictive marker for LV remodeling after CRT.

METHODS

Patients with heart failure, EF < 35% and LBBB (n = 22) underwent CMR with 4D flow prior to CRT. LV HDF were computed in three directions using the Navier-Stokes equations, reported in median N [interquartile range], and the ratio of transverse/longitudinal HDF was calculated for systole and diastole. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and 6 months after CRT. Patients with end-systolic volume reduction ≥ 15% were defined as responders.

RESULTS

Non-responders had smaller HDF than responders in the inferior-anterior direction in systole (0.06 [0.03] vs. 0.07 [0.03], p = 0.04), and in the apex-base direction in diastole (0.09 [0.02] vs. 0.1 [0.05], p = 0.047). Non-responders had larger diastolic HDF ratio compared to responders (0.89 vs. 0.67, p = 0.004). ROC analysis of diastolic HDF ratio for identifying CRT non-responders had AUC of 0.88 (p = 0.005) with sensitivity 57% and specificity 100% for ratio > 0.87. Intragroup comparison found higher HDF ratio in systole compared to diastole for responders (p = 0.003), but not for non-responders (p = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

Hemodynamic force ratio is a potential marker for identifying patients with heart failure and LBBB who are unlikely to benefit from CRT. Larger-scale studies are required before implementation of HDF analysis into clinical practice.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭伴左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的患者可能会接受心脏再同步治疗(CRT),但目前的选择标准并不精确,许多患者的治疗反应有限。血流动力学力(HDF)已被认为是 CRT 反应的标志物。因此,本研究旨在探讨左心室(LV)HDF 作为 CRT 后 LV 重构的预测标志物。

方法

22 例心力衰竭、EF<35%和 LBBB 的患者在 CRT 前接受了 4D 流的心脏磁共振(CMR)检查。使用纳维-斯托克斯方程计算 LV HDF,以中位数 N[四分位距]报告,并计算收缩期和舒张期的横向/纵向 HDF 比值。在 CRT 前和 6 个月后进行经胸超声心动图检查。定义左心室收缩末期容积减少≥15%的患者为有反应者。

结果

无反应者在收缩期下前方向(0.06[0.03] vs. 0.07[0.03],p=0.04)和舒张期心尖基底方向(0.09[0.02] vs. 0.1[0.05],p=0.047)的 HDF 小于有反应者。无反应者的舒张期 HDF 比值大于有反应者(0.89 vs. 0.67,p=0.004)。舒张期 HDF 比值识别 CRT 无反应者的 ROC 分析 AUC 为 0.88(p=0.005),敏感性为 57%,特异性为 100%,比值>0.87。组内比较发现,有反应者的收缩期 HDF 比值高于舒张期(p=0.003),但无反应者则不然(p=0.8)。

结论

血流动力学力比值可能是识别心力衰竭伴 LBBB 患者不能从 CRT 中获益的潜在标志物。在将 HDF 分析应用于临床实践之前,需要进行更大规模的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1056/10463519/242d60d5d90a/12968_2023_955_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验