• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Children's eating attitudes test (ChEAT): reliability and validation in German children and adolescents based on clinical data.儿童饮食态度测试(ChEAT):基于临床数据对德国儿童和青少年的信效度验证
Eat Weight Disord. 2025 Aug 14;30(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s40519-025-01773-w.
2
Intuitive Eating Scale-2 for adolescents: Validity and reliability study in Turkish adolescents.青少年直观饮食量表-2:土耳其青少年中的效度和信度研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Aug 21;184(9):566. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06412-1.
3
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
4
Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Arabic Version of the Eating Disorders After Bariatric Surgery Questionnaire (EDABS‑Q‑Arabic18).减重手术后饮食失调问卷阿拉伯语版(EDABS-Q-Arabic18)的翻译及心理测量学评估
Obes Surg. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07910-9.
5
Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Propensity to Cheat Scale Validation in the Ethiopian Public Higher Education Institutions.埃塞俄比亚公立高等教育机构中的验证性因素分析与作弊倾向量表验证
F1000Res. 2025 Jul 11;13:955. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.150357.3. eCollection 2024.
6
Interventions for preventing eating disorders in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年饮食失调的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(2):CD002891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002891.
7
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
8
Adaptation, confirmatory factor analysis, and psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Repetitive Eating Questionnaire.《重复进食问卷》巴西版的适应性、验证性因素分析及心理测量特性
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Apr;56(4):747-757. doi: 10.1002/eat.23943. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
9
Psychometric Evaluation of the Revised Suicide Crisis Inventory (SCI-2) in Germany: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in an Online and Outpatient Sample.德国修订版自杀危机量表(SCI - 2)的心理测量学评估:在线及门诊样本中的因子结构、信度和效度
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 May-Jun;32(3):e70106. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70106.
10
The Chinese version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents: a psychometric validity, reliability, and invariance study.青少年体力活动问卷中文版:心理测量学效度、信度和不变性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):3117. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20563-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual child factors affecting the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents: a systematic review.影响儿童和青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)诊断的个体儿童因素:一项系统综述。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May;34(5):1469-1496. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02590-9. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
2
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on administrative eating disorder prevalence in the outpatient sector and on severity of anorexia nervosa.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对门诊部门饮食失调症行政患病率及神经性厌食症严重程度的影响。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;34(3):983-995. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02527-2. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
3
Being Pregnant during COVID-19: Exploring the COVID-19 Related Beliefs, Behaviors, and Birth Outcome among Users of a Pregnancy App.在 COVID-19 期间怀孕:探索妊娠应用程序用户的 COVID-19 相关信念、行为和分娩结局。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 26;21(1):34. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010034.
4
Admission rates and clinical profiles of children and youth with eating disorders treated as inpatients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a German university hospital.新冠肺炎大流行前后,一家德国大学医院住院治疗的进食障碍儿童和青少年的入院率和临床特征。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 30;11:1281363. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281363. eCollection 2023.
5
Children's eating attitudes test (ChEAT): validation and reliability in Turkish children.儿童饮食态度测试(ChEAT):土耳其儿童中的效度与信度
J Eat Disord. 2023 Aug 31;11(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00811-1.
6
The Reliability and Validation of the Children's Eating Attitude Test among Chinese Samples.《儿童饮食态度测试在中国样本中的信度和效度》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 31;20(1):738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010738.
7
The children's eating attitudes test: French validation of a short version.儿童饮食态度测试:短版本的法验证。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Dec;26(8):2749-2756. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01158-9. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
Increased rates of eating disorders and their symptoms in women with major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders.在患有重度抑郁症和焦虑症的女性中,饮食障碍及其症状的发生率增加。
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Nov;53(11):1844-1854. doi: 10.1002/eat.23366. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
9
Eating disorders among patients with borderline personality disorder: understanding the prevalence and psychopathology.边缘型人格障碍患者中的饮食失调:了解患病率和精神病理学。
J Eat Disord. 2020 Aug 17;8:38. doi: 10.1186/s40337-020-00314-3. eCollection 2020.
10
Eating disorders.进食障碍。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):899-911. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30059-3.

儿童饮食态度测试(ChEAT):基于临床数据对德国儿童和青少年的信效度验证

Children's eating attitudes test (ChEAT): reliability and validation in German children and adolescents based on clinical data.

作者信息

Nonnast Lena, Derks Laura Maria, Deux Natalie, Holtmann Martin, Legenbauer Tanja

机构信息

LWL University Hospital Hamm for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hamm, Germany.

出版信息

Eat Weight Disord. 2025 Aug 14;30(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s40519-025-01773-w.

DOI:10.1007/s40519-025-01773-w
PMID:40813951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12354608/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to assess the validity of the German version of the Children's Eating Attitudes Test (ChEAT), an internationally used tool for the detection of eating disorder (ED) symptoms, in a clinical sample.

METHODS

The ChEAT self-report questionnaire, comprising 26 items, was employed to examine eating behaviors of a clinical sample of 342 adolescents (aged 12-18 years) undergoing inpatient treatment at a child and adolescent psychiatric clinic in Germany. The ChEAT was validated through an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and an examination of internal consistency. Subsequent analyses were conducted to identify differences associated with participant characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis. Furthermore, additional eating behaviors, depression, and anxiety symptoms were documented via supplementary questionnaires and correlated to the ChEAT to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity.

RESULTS

The factorial validity of the ChEAT was confirmed through EFA and CFA, resulting in a five-factor structure with the following dimensions: 'Body and Weight Concern,' 'Dieting,' 'Social Pressure,' 'Purging and Binge Eating,' and 'Food Preoccupation'. The 24-item model showed high internal consistency and demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data. Convergent and discriminant validity of the ChEAT was supported by significant correlations with other self-report questionnaires. Higher ChEAT average scores were observed in females and those with a history of eating or depressive disorders, whereas age or BMI showed no correlation.

CONCLUSION

The data demonstrate that the German version of the ChEAT appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for identifying ED symptoms in clinical samples. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the factor structure and validity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V, cross-sectional, descriptive study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估国际上用于检测饮食失调(ED)症状的工具——儿童饮食态度测试(ChEAT)德语版在临床样本中的有效性。

方法

采用包含26个条目的ChEAT自填问卷,对德国一家儿童和青少年精神病诊所接受住院治疗的342名青少年(年龄12 - 18岁)的临床样本的饮食行为进行检测。通过探索性因子分析(EFA)对ChEAT进行验证,随后进行验证性因子分析(CFA)并检验内部一致性。进行后续分析以确定与参与者特征(包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和诊断)相关的差异。此外,通过补充问卷记录额外的饮食行为、抑郁和焦虑症状,并与ChEAT进行相关性分析,以评估其收敛效度和区分效度。

结果

通过EFA和CFA证实了ChEAT的因子效度,得出一个五因子结构,维度如下:“身体和体重关注”、“节食”、“社会压力”、“清除和暴饮暴食”以及“食物专注”。24项模型显示出高内部一致性,并与数据拟合良好。ChEAT与其他自填问卷的显著相关性支持了其收敛效度和区分效度。在女性以及有饮食或抑郁障碍病史的人群中观察到较高的ChEAT平均得分,而年龄或BMI与之无相关性。

结论

数据表明,ChEAT德语版似乎是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于识别临床样本中的ED症状。然而需要进一步研究来评估其因子结构和效度。

证据水平

V,横断面描述性研究。