Harris Alison M, Denaro Chandlyr M, Reed Catherine L
Department of Psychological Science, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA 91711, United States.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Jan 18;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf059.
In electroencephalography (EEG), action execution (AE) is reliably associated with reductions in the mu rhythm, a periodic oscillation (8-14 Hz) over sensorimotor cortex. Similar patterns of "mu suppression" have been reported during observations of others' actions, leading to claims that the mu rhythm indexes motor contributions to social perception. However, evidence for mu suppression during action observation (AO) is mixed, possibly due to methodological considerations (e.g. sample size, recording sites) and perceptual and attentional confounds. Moreover, measurements of periodic oscillations may be conflated with underlying aperiodic ("1/f-like") neural activity, potentially influencing estimation of the EEG power spectrum. Here we examined the influence of aperiodic factors on mu suppression using 128-channel EEG in a large sample (N = 109), both during AE and in an AO task with appropriate visual and attentional controls. Whereas AE was consistently associated with significant mu suppression, we initially failed to find significant mu suppression for AO, suggesting that attentional and perceptual confounds may bias mu estimation during AO. However, removing the aperiodic component restored mu suppression over central electrodes. Although significant, mu suppression for AO appears less robust than originally reported, with aperiodic activity contributing to variability in the estimation of mu suppression during AO.
在脑电图(EEG)中,动作执行(AE)与运动皮层上的μ节律(一种8 - 14赫兹的周期性振荡)的降低可靠相关。在观察他人动作期间也报告了类似的“μ抑制”模式,这导致有人声称μ节律反映了运动对社会感知的贡献。然而,动作观察(AO)期间μ抑制的证据并不一致,这可能是由于方法学因素(例如样本量、记录部位)以及感知和注意力方面的混杂因素。此外,周期性振荡的测量可能与潜在的非周期性(“类1/f”)神经活动相混淆,这可能会影响EEG功率谱的估计。在这里,我们使用128通道脑电图,在一个大样本(N = 109)中,在动作执行期间以及在具有适当视觉和注意力控制的动作观察任务中,研究了非周期性因素对μ抑制的影响。虽然动作执行始终与显著的μ抑制相关,但我们最初未能在动作观察中发现显著的μ抑制,这表明注意力和感知方面的混杂因素可能会在动作观察期间使μ估计产生偏差。然而,去除非周期性成分后,中央电极上的μ抑制得以恢复。虽然显著,但动作观察时的μ抑制似乎不如最初报道的那么稳健,非周期性活动导致了动作观察期间μ抑制估计的变异性。