Cha Seungwoo, Kim Kyoung Tae, Chang Won Kee, Paik Nam-Jong, Choi Ji Soo, Lim Hyunmi, Kim Won-Seok, Ku Jeonghun
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 May 28;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01653-5.
The primary aim of this study was to explore the neurophysiological effects of motor imagery neurofeedback using electroencephalography (EEG), specifically focusing on mu suppression during serial motor attempts, and to assess its potential benefits in patients with subacute stroke.
A total of 15 patients with hemiplegia following subacute ischemic stroke were prospectively enrolled in this randomized cross-over study. This study comprised two experiments: neurofeedback and sham. Each experiment included four blocks: three blocks of resting, grasp, resting, and an interventional task, followed by one block of resting and grasp. During the resting sessions, participants fixated on a white cross on a black background for 2 min without moving their upper extremities. In the grasp sessions, participants were instructed to grasp and release their paretic hand at a frequency of about 1 Hz for 3 min while maintaining fixation on the white cross. During the interventional task, the neurofeedback presented a punching image using the affected upper limb, corresponding to the mu suppression induced by imagined movement for 3 min. In contrast, the sham presented an image based on mu suppression data from randomly selected participants. EEG data were recorded throughout the experiment, and data from electrodes C3/C4 and P3/P4 were analyzed to compare the degree of mu suppression between the neurofeedback and sham experiments.
Significant mu suppression was observed in the bilateral motor and parietal cortices during the neurofeedback experiment compared with the sham across serial sessions (p < 0.001). Following neurofeedback, real grasping sessions showed progressive strengthening of mu suppression in the ipsilesional motor cortex and bilateral parietal cortices compared to sessions following sham (p < 0.05). This effect was not observed in the contralesional motor cortex.
Motor imagery neurofeedback significantly enhances mu suppression in the ipsilesional motor and bilateral parietal cortices during motor attempts in patients with subacute stroke. These findings suggest that motor imagery neurofeedback could serve as a promising adjunctive therapy to enhance motor-related cortical activity and support motor rehabilitation in patients with stroke.
本研究的主要目的是利用脑电图(EEG)探索运动想象神经反馈的神经生理效应,特别关注连续运动尝试期间的μ波抑制,并评估其对亚急性中风患者的潜在益处。
本随机交叉研究前瞻性纳入了15例亚急性缺血性中风后偏瘫患者。本研究包括两个实验:神经反馈和假刺激。每个实验包括四个阶段:三个休息、抓握、休息阶段和一个干预任务阶段,随后是一个休息和抓握阶段。在休息阶段,参与者在黑色背景上注视一个白色十字2分钟,上肢保持不动。在抓握阶段,参与者被指示以约1赫兹的频率抓握和松开患侧手3分钟,同时保持注视白色十字。在干预任务阶段,神经反馈使用受影响的上肢呈现一个拳击图像,对应于想象运动诱发的μ波抑制,持续3分钟。相比之下,假刺激根据随机选择参与者的μ波抑制数据呈现图像。在整个实验过程中记录EEG数据,并分析电极C3/C4和P3/P4的数据,以比较神经反馈和假刺激实验之间的μ波抑制程度。
与假刺激相比,在连续阶段的神经反馈实验中,双侧运动和顶叶皮质观察到显著的μ波抑制(p < 0.001)。神经反馈后,与假刺激后的阶段相比,实际抓握阶段在患侧运动皮质和双侧顶叶皮质中显示出μ波抑制的逐渐增强(p < 0.05)。在对侧运动皮质中未观察到这种效应。
运动想象神经反馈在亚急性中风患者运动尝试期间显著增强患侧运动和双侧顶叶皮质中的μ波抑制。这些发现表明,运动想象神经反馈可作为一种有前景的辅助治疗方法,以增强与运动相关的皮质活动并支持中风患者的运动康复。