• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理预接种可提高对疫苗错误信息的抵御能力,并降低分享此类信息的意愿。

Psychological inoculation improves resilience to and reduces willingness to share vaccine misinformation.

作者信息

Appel Ruth E, Roozenbeek Jon, Rayburn-Reeves Rebecca, Basol Melisa, Corbin Jonathan, Compton Josh, van der Linden Sander

机构信息

Department of Communication, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

Department of War Studies, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 18;15(1):29830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09462-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-09462-5
PMID:40820144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12358572/
Abstract

Vaccine misinformation endangers public health by contributing to reduced vaccine uptake. We developed a short online game to reduce people's susceptibility to vaccine misinformation. Building on inoculation theory, the Bad Vaxx game exposes people to weakened doses of manipulation techniques commonly used in vaccine misinformation and to strategies to identify these techniques. Across three preregistered randomized controlled trials (N = 2,326), we find that the game significantly improves participants' ability to discern vaccine misinformation from non-misinformation, their confidence in their ability to do so, and the quality of their sharing decisions. Further, taking the perspective of a character fighting as opposed to spreading misinformation is more effective on some outcome measures. In line with the learning goals of the intervention, we show that participants improve their ability to correctly identify the use of specific misinformation techniques. This insight is important because teaching manipulation technique recognition is not only effective to help evaluate information about vaccines, but also more viable than trying to debunk myriads of constantly-evolving myths. Our findings suggest that a short, low-cost, gamified intervention can increase resilience to vaccine misinformation.

摘要

疫苗错误信息会导致疫苗接种率降低,从而危及公众健康。我们开发了一款简短的在线游戏,以降低人们对疫苗错误信息的易感性。基于接种理论,“不良疫苗”游戏让人们接触到疫苗错误信息中常用的弱化版操纵技巧,以及识别这些技巧的策略。在三项预先注册的随机对照试验(N = 2326)中,我们发现该游戏显著提高了参与者从非错误信息中辨别疫苗错误信息的能力、他们对自己辨别能力的信心以及他们分享决策的质量。此外,从一个与传播错误信息作斗争的角色的角度出发在某些结果指标上更有效。符合干预的学习目标,我们表明参与者提高了正确识别特定错误信息技巧使用的能力。这一见解很重要,因为教授操纵技巧识别不仅有助于评估有关疫苗的信息,而且比试图揭穿无数不断演变的谣言更可行。我们的研究结果表明,一种简短、低成本、游戏化的干预措施可以增强对疫苗错误信息的抵御能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd39/12358572/ebad8d32d4cc/41598_2025_9462_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd39/12358572/1a677fe07980/41598_2025_9462_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd39/12358572/bc8a8c1b42cb/41598_2025_9462_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd39/12358572/d3a7f2df8aae/41598_2025_9462_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd39/12358572/61465e440cf1/41598_2025_9462_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd39/12358572/ebad8d32d4cc/41598_2025_9462_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd39/12358572/1a677fe07980/41598_2025_9462_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd39/12358572/bc8a8c1b42cb/41598_2025_9462_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd39/12358572/d3a7f2df8aae/41598_2025_9462_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd39/12358572/61465e440cf1/41598_2025_9462_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd39/12358572/ebad8d32d4cc/41598_2025_9462_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychological inoculation improves resilience to and reduces willingness to share vaccine misinformation.心理预接种可提高对疫苗错误信息的抵御能力,并降低分享此类信息的意愿。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 18;15(1):29830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09462-5.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
4
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
5
Interventions aimed at communities to inform and/or educate about early childhood vaccination.针对社区开展的旨在宣传和/或教育幼儿疫苗接种的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 19;2014(11):CD010232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010232.pub2.
6
The complex landscape of vaccine hesitancy and hesitant adopters: Quantitative predictors and thematic insights into COVID-19 vaccine attitudes.疫苗犹豫及犹豫接种者的复杂情况:新冠疫苗态度的定量预测因素及主题洞察
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2511350. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2511350. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
7
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
8
A systematic review of communication interventions for countering vaccine misinformation.疫苗错误信息应对沟通干预措施的系统评价。
Vaccine. 2023 Jan 27;41(5):1018-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.059. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
9
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Measurement, Characterization, and Mapping of COVID-19 Misinformation in Spain: Cross-Sectional Study.西班牙新冠疫情虚假信息的测量、特征描述与映射:横断面研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jun 16;5:e69945. doi: 10.2196/69945.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of gist intervention on automated system interpretability and user decision making.干预要点对自动化系统可解释性和用户决策的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Oct 9;9(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00594-2.
2
Quantifying the impact of misinformation and vaccine-skeptical content on Facebook.量化错误信息和疫苗怀疑论内容在脸书上的影响。
Science. 2024 May 31;384(6699):eadk3451. doi: 10.1126/science.adk3451.
3
Researching and countering misinformation in the Global South.研究和抵制南半球的虚假信息。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Feb;55:101733. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101733. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
4
How can doctors counter health misinformation on social media?医生如何应对社交媒体上的健康错误信息?
BMJ. 2023 Aug 30;382:1932. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p1932.
5
How to think about whether misinformation interventions work.如何思考错误信息干预措施是否有效。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Aug;7(8):1231-1233. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01667-w.
6
Psychological Inoculation for Credibility Assessment, Sharing Intention, and Discernment of Misinformation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心理接种对可信度评估、分享意愿和错误信息识别的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 29;25:e49255. doi: 10.2196/49255.
7
Inoculating Against Anti-Vaccination Conspiracies.防范反疫苗阴谋论
Health Commun. 2024 Aug;39(9):1760-1768. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2235733. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
8
The game increases accuracy in discerning between real and inauthentic social media accounts.该游戏提高了辨别真实和虚假社交媒体账户的准确性。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Mar 22;2(4):pgad094. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad094. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
Gamified inoculation interventions do not improve discrimination between true and fake news: Reanalyzing existing research with receiver operating characteristic analysis.游戏化接种干预措施并不能提高真假新闻之间的辨别能力:使用受试者工作特征分析对现有研究进行重新分析。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Sep;152(9):2411-2437. doi: 10.1037/xge0001395. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
10
Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media.心理预接种可提高抵御社交媒体错误信息的恢复力。
Sci Adv. 2022 Aug 26;8(34):eabo6254. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo6254. Epub 2022 Aug 24.