Suppr超能文献

探索益生菌给药途径对特应性进程中免疫反应的影响。

Exploring the influence of probiotic administration routes on immune responses in atopic march.

作者信息

Zhang Fang-Yu, Yang Chi-Yu, Huang Chien-Hsun, Wang I-Jen

机构信息

Animal Technology Research Center, Agriculture Technology Research Institute, Miaoli, Taiwan.

Bioresource Collection and Research Center (BCRC), Food Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 1;16:1601596. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1601596. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) have a higher likelihood of developing asthma, the so-called atopic march. Previous studies have suggested that probiotics can modulate development of the immune system and atopic disorders. However, the exact mechanisms and whether the route of administration of probiotics has a clinical effect are unknown. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate whether different routes of administration of probiotics may have different effects.

METHOD

Probiotics Bacteroides plebeius, B. ovatus, 74-B and YCFA-33 were administered to mice via oral and nasal routes for 4 weeks, followed by the induction of AD using ovalbumin (OVA). The condition of the stimulated skin and histology of skin tissues were evaluated. In addition, 3 days of consecutive exposure to OVA (3%) aerosol was used to induce asthma at the end of the AD experiment. Serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), IgG, IL-4, IFN-γ, and TNF-α levels and histological evaluations of lung tissues were assessed after the experiments.

RESULT

The oral administration of probiotics B. plebeius and B. ovatus may have improved the inflammatory response of OVA-induced asthma. The nasal administration of the probiotics 74-B and YCFA-33 may have alleviated the symptoms of skin redness and itching of OVA-induced atopic dermatitis. These effects may have been due to reduced infiltration of white blood cells in the stimulated skin area and dampened inflammatory responses. In the later asthma model, YCFA-33 administration significantly increased total IgG and IgG1 in serum, reduced OVA-IgE levels and IL-4 levels, decreased neutrophil content and TNF-α expression, and increased IFN-γ levels in lung lavage fluid (p<0.05). These effects may have blocked the progression from AD to asthma pulmonary inflammation.

CONCLUSION

B. ovatus had better effects via oral administration while 74-B and YCFA-33 had better effects via nasal administration. Oral administration is not always the best route. Probiotics may mitigate allergic reactions and pulmonary inflammation. These findings could contribute to the development of innovative biomarkers and early interventions for managing asthma and atopic disorders.

摘要

背景

患有特应性皮炎(AD)的儿童患哮喘的可能性更高,即所谓的特应性进程。先前的研究表明,益生菌可以调节免疫系统和特应性疾病的发展。然而,确切机制以及益生菌的给药途径是否具有临床效果尚不清楚。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以调查益生菌的不同给药途径是否可能产生不同的效果。

方法

将益生菌多形拟杆菌、卵形拟杆菌、74 - B和YCFA - 33通过口服和鼻内途径给予小鼠4周,随后使用卵清蛋白(OVA)诱导AD。评估受刺激皮肤的状况和皮肤组织的组织学。此外,在AD实验结束时,连续3天暴露于OVA(3%)气雾剂以诱导哮喘。实验后评估血清免疫球蛋白E(IgE)、IgG、IL - 4、IFN - γ和TNF - α水平以及肺组织的组织学评估。

结果

口服多形拟杆菌和卵形拟杆菌可能改善了OVA诱导的哮喘的炎症反应。鼻内给予益生菌74 - B和YCFA - 33可能减轻了OVA诱导的特应性皮炎的皮肤发红和瘙痒症状。这些作用可能是由于受刺激皮肤区域白细胞浸润减少和炎症反应减弱。在随后的哮喘模型中,给予YCFA - 33显著增加了血清中总IgG和IgG1,降低了OVA - IgE水平和IL - 4水平,减少了中性粒细胞含量和TNF - α表达,并增加了肺灌洗液中的IFN - γ水平(p<0.05)。这些作用可能阻止了从AD到哮喘肺部炎症的进展。

结论

卵形拟杆菌经口服给药效果更好,而74 - B和YCFA - 33经鼻内给药效果更好。口服给药并不总是最佳途径。益生菌可能减轻过敏反应和肺部炎症。这些发现可能有助于开发用于管理哮喘和特应性疾病的创新生物标志物和早期干预措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验